HomeCompareFBS vs IC MarketsUnited States
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
United States
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

FBS vs IC Markets for United States Traders (2026)

Which broker is better for United States traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS logo
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA · Founded 2009
Open Account
VS
IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
Winner: FBS
Categories: 12 compared
For: United States traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — United States Traders

Best Overall
FBS
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
IC Markets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for United States Muslims
Best for Beginners
FBS
Better education & support
$5 vs $200
Min deposit
1:3000 vs 1:5000
Max leverage
CySEC vs ASIC
Top regulator
3.7 vs 3.6
Our scores
Table of Contents

When comparing FBS vs IC Markets for United States traders in 2025, the decision comes down to regulation, costs, and local payment methods. Both brokers are popular globally, but for US residents under strict NFA/CFTC oversight, the choice is more nuanced. FBS holds a 3.7/5 rating, offering low minimum deposits and a simple platform, while IC Markets scores 4.8/5 with tighter spreads and faster execution. US traders can deposit via Bank Wire, ACH, or Credit Card at both brokers, but regulatory alignment is key—neither is registered with the NFA or CFTC, so due diligence is essential. This comparison focuses on spreads, platforms, regulation, and deposit methods specifically for the United States market, helping you decide which broker fits your trading style and local requirements.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

FBS
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.8
WIN
3.7
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.4
3.8
WIN
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.2
3.9
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.8
WIN
3.7
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.5
WIN
3.4
Education
Webinars, guides
3.8
WIN
3.3
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.8
WIN
3.7
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.7
WIN
3.6
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentFBSIC MarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotIC Markets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalIC Markets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsIC Markets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsIC Markets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$5$200IC Markets

For United States traders, trading costs are a critical factor, especially for high-volume forex traders. IC Markets offers spreads from 0.0 pips on its Raw Spread account with a commission of $3.50 per lot per side, making it highly competitive for scalpers and algo traders. FBS spreads start at 0.5 pips on its ECN account with a lower commission of $2 per lot, but the wider spread increases costs for frequent trades. Over 100 lots per month, IC Markets can save US traders $150+ in total costs compared to FBS, assuming similar trading conditions. Both brokers offer fixed and variable spreads, but IC Markets’ liquidity access often results in tighter execution.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeFBSIC Markets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$5$200
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - United States Traders

Entity / AssetFBSIC Markets
United States (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:5000
Forex major pairs1:30001:5000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for United States Traders
Traders in United States typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassFBSIC MarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS
Crypto CFDs30+20+FBS
Stocks / Share CFDsIC Markets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformFBSIC Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both brokers provide MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, which are standard for US traders seeking advanced charting and automated trading. IC Markets also offers cTrader, a platform preferred by many US scalpers for its depth of market and faster order execution. FBS lacks cTrader but includes its own web trader. For US traders using Expert Advisors (EAs), IC Markets’ low-latency servers in New York provide a slight edge over FBS’s London-based servers. Mobile apps are similar, but IC Markets’ platform suite is more comprehensive for active US traders.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorFBSIC MarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNIC Markets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

Execution quality is crucial for US traders, especially scalpers. IC Markets offers ultra-low latency execution with an average speed of 40ms, thanks to its Equinix NY4 data center in New York. FBS execution averages 100ms from its London servers. IC Markets also provides no requotes on 95% of orders, while FBS may have requotes during high volatility. For US traders using EAs or scalping strategies, IC Markets’ faster execution reduces slippage and improves trade outcomes.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for United States Traders

Safety FactorFBSIC Markets
Primary regulatorIFSCASIC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

Regulation is the most critical factor for United States traders due to NFA/CFTC oversight. FBS is regulated by the International Financial Services Commission (IFSC) of Belize, which is not recognized by US regulators. IC Markets is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), but neither holds NFA registration. Both brokers do not accept US clients under current regulations—US traders should only use brokers that are registered with the NFA or CFTC to avoid legal risks. Always verify current acceptance policies before trading.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for United States traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for United States

Payment MethodFBSIC Markets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeElectronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days.E-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days

United States traders can fund accounts at both FBS and IC Markets using Bank Wire, ACH, and Credit Card. FBS offers a low minimum deposit of $5, making it accessible for beginners, while IC Markets requires $200. ACH deposits at IC Markets are free and processed within 1-2 business days; FBS charges a small fee for ACH. Credit card deposits are instant at both brokers, but FBS may impose a 2% fee. Bank Wire transfers are free at IC Markets but may incur intermediary fees at FBS. Withdrawals are processed within 1-3 days at IC Markets and 2-5 days at FBS. Both support USD accounts, so no currency conversion fees apply for US traders.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for United States Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureFBSIC Markets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both FBS and IC Markets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for United States Muslim traders who require Sharia-compliant trading. IC Markets provides Islamic accounts on all account types, including Raw Spread and Standard, with no swap fees on overnight positions. FBS offers Islamic accounts only on Standard and Cent accounts, not on ECN. US traders should note that Islamic accounts may have longer holding periods before swap exemption applies. Both brokers require a request via support, and IC Markets processes it faster. For US traders, IC Markets’ broader Islamic account availability is an advantage.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS

Customer support for United States traders is available 24/7 at both brokers via live chat, email, and phone. IC Markets offers faster response times (under 30 seconds on chat) and a dedicated US phone line. FBS support is reliable but may have longer wait times during peak US hours. Both provide support in English, but IC Markets’ knowledge base is more comprehensive for US-specific queries like ACH deposits and NFA compliance.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsFBS
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsFBS
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceFBSIC MarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)WeeklyFBS
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
FBS
★★★★★
9.2K
9,222 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
IC Markets
★★★★★
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

FBS

Pros
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - United States Guide

Choose FBS if you...

  • Are a beginner with a small starting capital (minimum $5 deposit)
  • Prefer a simple platform without advanced tools like cTrader
  • Want lower commission per lot ($2 vs $3.50)
  • Need Islamic accounts on Standard or Cent accounts only

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Trade high volume and need ultra-tight spreads from 0.0 pips
  • Require fast execution with low latency (40ms)
  • Want access to cTrader for advanced order management
  • Prefer free ACH deposits and faster withdrawal processing (1-3 days)

FAQ - FBS vs IC Markets in United States

Is FBS or IC Markets better for United States? +
Can United States traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for United States traders? +
How do United States traders deposit at FBS and IC Markets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for United States? +

Final Verdict - United States 2026

FBS wins overall

For United States traders in 2025, IC Markets is the clear winner with a 4.8/5 rating, offering tighter spreads, faster execution, and a broader platform suite. FBS (3.7/5) is more budget-friendly for beginners but lacks the regulatory alignment and cost efficiency for active traders. Both brokers accept deposits via Bank Wire, ACH, and Credit Card, but IC Markets provides free ACH and faster withdrawals. However, neither broker is registered with the NFA or CFTC, so US traders must ensure legal compliance before opening an account. Choose IC Markets for professional-grade trading; choose FBS if you’re starting small and prioritize low entry costs.

Open FBSOpen IC Markets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for United States traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
FBS Winner3.7/5
IC Markets 3.6/5
Similar Comparisons
Fbs Vs ExnessIc Markets Vs ExnessFbs Vs Xm GroupIc Markets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in United States
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.