Which broker is better for Australia traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
For Australia traders seeking ASIC-regulated brokers, FBS and IC Markets are two prominent choices, but they cater to different needs. FBS, with a score of 3.7/5, offers a user-friendly platform, flexible account types, and bonuses that appeal to newer traders. In contrast, IC Markets, scoring 4.8/5, is the top choice for experienced traders due to its raw spreads, ultra-fast execution, and deep liquidity. Both brokers accept AUD deposits and support local payment methods like BPAY, POLi, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card, making them accessible. However, the regulatory environment under ASIC ensures strict compliance, client fund segregation, and negative balance protection. This comparison focuses on what matters most to Australian traders: cost, reliability, and local support. Whether you prioritize low spreads or a broader feature set, understanding these differences will guide your decision.
| Instrument | FBS | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | IC Markets |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | IC Markets |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | IC Markets |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | IC Markets |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $5 | $200 | IC Markets |
When comparing trading costs for Australia traders, IC Markets clearly outperforms FBS. IC Markets offers Raw Spread accounts with spreads from 0.0 pips and a commission of $3.50 per lot per side, making it ideal for scalpers and high-volume traders. FBS spreads start at 0.2 pips on its Zero Spread account, but with higher commissions. For standard accounts, IC Markets spreads average 0.6 pips with no commission, while FBS standard spreads are around 1.0 pip. Over 100 trades per month, IC Markets can save Australian traders hundreds of dollars in spreads, especially when trading major pairs like AUD/USD.
| Account Type | FBS | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $5 | $200 |
| Entity / Asset | FBS | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Australia (offshore) | Up to 1:3000 | Up to 1:5000 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:3000 | 1:5000 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | FBS | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | FBS |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | FBS |
| Crypto CFDs | 30+ | 20+ | FBS |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | ✗ | IC Markets |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | FBS | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✓ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✓ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✓ |
| TradingView | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Both brokers offer MetaTrader 4 and 5, but IC Markets provides additional platforms like cTrader and WebTrader, which are popular among Australian traders for their advanced charting and order management. FBS focuses on MT4/MT5 with a proprietary app for mobile trading. IC Markets' cTrader is particularly favored for its depth of market and one-click trading, essential for fast-moving markets. For Australia traders who need reliable execution during volatile sessions, IC Markets' platform suite offers more flexibility.
| Factor | FBS | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | IC Markets |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | FBS |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
IC Markets is renowned for its execution speed, with average order execution under 40 milliseconds using Equinix NY4 servers. This is critical for Australian traders during high-volatility sessions like ASX openings. FBS execution is reliable but slower, averaging around 100 milliseconds. For scalpers and algorithmic traders, IC Markets' low-latency infrastructure provides a clear edge.
| Safety Factor | FBS | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | IFSC | ASIC |
| Top-tier regulated | ✗ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Both FBS and IC Markets are regulated by ASIC, ensuring Australia traders benefit from strict oversight, client fund segregation, and negative balance protection. IC Markets has a stronger reputation for compliance, with no major regulatory issues in Australia. FBS, while ASIC-licensed, has faced some international scrutiny, though its Australian operations remain compliant. For Australia traders, choosing an ASIC-regulated broker means access to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) for dispute resolution, adding an extra layer of protection.
| Payment Method | FBS | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neteller | ✓ | ✓ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✓ | ✓ |
| Withdrawal time | Electronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days. | E-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days |
Australia traders can fund their accounts at both FBS and IC Markets using BPAY, POLi, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card (Visa/Mastercard). Deposits are processed instantly with BPAY and POLi, and typically free of fees for AUD accounts. IC Markets also supports PayPal, while FBS offers additional e-wallets like Skrill and Neteller. Withdrawals are efficient: IC Markets processes within 1 business day for bank transfers, while FBS may take 2-3 days. Both brokers do not charge internal fees, but third-party bank charges may apply. For high-volume traders, IC Markets' faster withdrawal times are a notable advantage.
| Islamic Account Feature | FBS | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
Both FBS and IC Markets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Muslim traders in Australia. IC Markets provides swap-free accounts on all account types, including Raw Spread and Standard, without any time limit. FBS offers Islamic accounts on select account types, but may apply a fee after a certain period. For Australian Muslim traders seeking long-term compliance, IC Markets is the more flexible option, while FBS is suitable for shorter-term trading needs.
| Support Feature | FBS | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | FBS |
IC Markets offers 24/7 customer support via live chat, email, and phone, with a dedicated team for Australian traders during Sydney hours. FBS provides 24/5 support with live chat and email, but phone support is limited. Both brokers have extensive FAQ sections, but IC Markets' response times are faster, averaging under 2 minutes for live chat queries.
| Mobile Feature | FBS | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | FBS |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | FBS |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Resource | FBS | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | ✗ | FBS |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | FBS |
Choose FBS if you...
Choose IC Markets if you...
For Australia traders, the choice between FBS and IC Markets depends on trading style. IC Markets is the superior option for experienced traders prioritizing low costs, fast execution, and robust ASIC regulation. Its support for BPAY, POLi, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card makes deposits seamless, while its reputation for reliability is unmatched. FBS, while offering more account flexibility and bonuses, falls short on cost and execution quality. Given the competitive landscape for Australian traders, IC Markets' 4.8/5 rating reflects its dominance. If you trade frequently or in large volumes, IC Markets is the clear winner.