HomeCompareFBS vs IC MarketsAustralia
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
Australia
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

FBS vs IC Markets 2026: Which ASIC-Regulated Broker is Best for Australia Traders?

Which broker is better for Australia traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS logo
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA · Founded 2009
Open Account
VS
IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
Winner: FBS
Categories: 12 compared
For: Australia traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Australia Traders

Best Overall
FBS
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
IC Markets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for Australia Muslims
Best for Beginners
FBS
Better education & support
$5 vs $200
Min deposit
1:3000 vs 1:5000
Max leverage
CySEC vs ASIC
Top regulator
3.7 vs 3.6
Our scores
Table of Contents

For Australia traders seeking ASIC-regulated brokers, FBS and IC Markets are two prominent choices, but they cater to different needs. FBS, with a score of 3.7/5, offers a user-friendly platform, flexible account types, and bonuses that appeal to newer traders. In contrast, IC Markets, scoring 4.8/5, is the top choice for experienced traders due to its raw spreads, ultra-fast execution, and deep liquidity. Both brokers accept AUD deposits and support local payment methods like BPAY, POLi, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card, making them accessible. However, the regulatory environment under ASIC ensures strict compliance, client fund segregation, and negative balance protection. This comparison focuses on what matters most to Australian traders: cost, reliability, and local support. Whether you prioritize low spreads or a broader feature set, understanding these differences will guide your decision.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

FBS
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.8
WIN
3.7
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.4
3.8
WIN
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.2
3.9
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.8
WIN
3.7
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.5
WIN
3.4
Education
Webinars, guides
3.8
WIN
3.3
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.8
WIN
3.7
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.7
WIN
3.6
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentFBSIC MarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotIC Markets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalIC Markets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsIC Markets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsIC Markets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$5$200IC Markets

When comparing trading costs for Australia traders, IC Markets clearly outperforms FBS. IC Markets offers Raw Spread accounts with spreads from 0.0 pips and a commission of $3.50 per lot per side, making it ideal for scalpers and high-volume traders. FBS spreads start at 0.2 pips on its Zero Spread account, but with higher commissions. For standard accounts, IC Markets spreads average 0.6 pips with no commission, while FBS standard spreads are around 1.0 pip. Over 100 trades per month, IC Markets can save Australian traders hundreds of dollars in spreads, especially when trading major pairs like AUD/USD.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeFBSIC Markets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$5$200
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Australia Traders

Entity / AssetFBSIC Markets
Australia (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:5000
Forex major pairs1:30001:5000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Australia Traders
Traders in Australia typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassFBSIC MarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS
Crypto CFDs30+20+FBS
Stocks / Share CFDsIC Markets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformFBSIC Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both brokers offer MetaTrader 4 and 5, but IC Markets provides additional platforms like cTrader and WebTrader, which are popular among Australian traders for their advanced charting and order management. FBS focuses on MT4/MT5 with a proprietary app for mobile trading. IC Markets' cTrader is particularly favored for its depth of market and one-click trading, essential for fast-moving markets. For Australia traders who need reliable execution during volatile sessions, IC Markets' platform suite offers more flexibility.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorFBSIC MarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNIC Markets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

IC Markets is renowned for its execution speed, with average order execution under 40 milliseconds using Equinix NY4 servers. This is critical for Australian traders during high-volatility sessions like ASX openings. FBS execution is reliable but slower, averaging around 100 milliseconds. For scalpers and algorithmic traders, IC Markets' low-latency infrastructure provides a clear edge.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Australia Traders

Safety FactorFBSIC Markets
Primary regulatorIFSCASIC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

Both FBS and IC Markets are regulated by ASIC, ensuring Australia traders benefit from strict oversight, client fund segregation, and negative balance protection. IC Markets has a stronger reputation for compliance, with no major regulatory issues in Australia. FBS, while ASIC-licensed, has faced some international scrutiny, though its Australian operations remain compliant. For Australia traders, choosing an ASIC-regulated broker means access to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) for dispute resolution, adding an extra layer of protection.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Australia traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Australia

Payment MethodFBSIC Markets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeElectronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days.E-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days

Australia traders can fund their accounts at both FBS and IC Markets using BPAY, POLi, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card (Visa/Mastercard). Deposits are processed instantly with BPAY and POLi, and typically free of fees for AUD accounts. IC Markets also supports PayPal, while FBS offers additional e-wallets like Skrill and Neteller. Withdrawals are efficient: IC Markets processes within 1 business day for bank transfers, while FBS may take 2-3 days. Both brokers do not charge internal fees, but third-party bank charges may apply. For high-volume traders, IC Markets' faster withdrawal times are a notable advantage.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Australia Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureFBSIC Markets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both FBS and IC Markets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Muslim traders in Australia. IC Markets provides swap-free accounts on all account types, including Raw Spread and Standard, without any time limit. FBS offers Islamic accounts on select account types, but may apply a fee after a certain period. For Australian Muslim traders seeking long-term compliance, IC Markets is the more flexible option, while FBS is suitable for shorter-term trading needs.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS

IC Markets offers 24/7 customer support via live chat, email, and phone, with a dedicated team for Australian traders during Sydney hours. FBS provides 24/5 support with live chat and email, but phone support is limited. Both brokers have extensive FAQ sections, but IC Markets' response times are faster, averaging under 2 minutes for live chat queries.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsFBS
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsFBS
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceFBSIC MarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)WeeklyFBS
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
FBS
★★★★★
9.2K
9,222 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
IC Markets
★★★★★
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

FBS

Pros
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Australia Guide

Choose FBS if you...

  • Prefer a broker with bonuses and promotions to boost your trading capital.
  • Want a variety of account types, including micro and cent accounts for smaller trades.
  • Need a user-friendly platform with educational resources for learning.
  • Value additional payment methods like Skrill and Neteller alongside local options.

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Are an experienced trader seeking the lowest spreads and commissions.
  • Need ultra-fast execution for scalping or high-frequency trading.
  • Prefer a broker with a proven track record of ASIC compliance and no restrictions on trading styles.
  • Want access to cTrader for advanced charting and depth of market.

FAQ - FBS vs IC Markets in Australia

Is FBS or IC Markets better for Australia? +
Can Australia traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Australia traders? +
How do Australia traders deposit at FBS and IC Markets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Australia? +

Final Verdict - Australia 2026

FBS wins overall

For Australia traders, the choice between FBS and IC Markets depends on trading style. IC Markets is the superior option for experienced traders prioritizing low costs, fast execution, and robust ASIC regulation. Its support for BPAY, POLi, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card makes deposits seamless, while its reputation for reliability is unmatched. FBS, while offering more account flexibility and bonuses, falls short on cost and execution quality. Given the competitive landscape for Australian traders, IC Markets' 4.8/5 rating reflects its dominance. If you trade frequently or in large volumes, IC Markets is the clear winner.

Open FBSOpen IC Markets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Australia traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
FBS Winner3.7/5
IC Markets 3.6/5
Similar Comparisons
Fbs Vs ExnessIc Markets Vs ExnessFbs Vs Xm GroupIc Markets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in Australia
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.