Home β€Ί Compare β€Ί FBS vs IC Markets β€” Taiwan
JO
Written by
Joseph Oloo
AM
Fact checked by
Alia Mehmood
πŸ“Š
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
Taiwan
πŸ” Complete Head-to-Head Comparison Β· 2026

FBS vs IC Markets: Taiwan Trader Comparison 2025

Which broker is better for Taiwan traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS logo
FBS
CySEC Β· IFSC Β· FSCA Β· Founded 2009
Open Account β†’
VS
IC Markets logo
IC Markets
ASIC Β· CySEC Β· FSA Β· Founded 2007
Open Account β†’
πŸ† Winner: FBS
πŸ“Š Categories: 12 compared
🌍 For: Taiwan traders
πŸ“… Updated: July 2026
πŸ”„ Compare any two brokers
VS
⚑ Quick Verdict β€” Taiwan Traders
πŸ† Best Overall
FBS
Higher overall score & more features
πŸ’° Best Spreads
IC Markets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
β˜ͺ️ Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for Taiwan Muslims
πŸŽ“ Best for Beginners
FBS
Better education & support
πŸ“‰
$1 vs $200
Min deposit
βš–οΈ
1:3000 vs 1:500
Max leverage
πŸ›‘οΈ
CySEC vs ASIC
Top regulator
⭐
3.7 vs 3.6
Our scores
πŸ“‹ Table of Contents
→ Overall Scores→ Trading Costs→ Account Types→ Leverage→ Instruments→ Platforms→ Execution Quality→ Regulation & Safety→ Deposits & Withdrawals→ Islamic Accounts→ Customer Support→ Mobile App→ Education & Research→ User Reviews→ Pros & Cons→ Who Should Use?→ FAQ→ Final Verdict

Choosing the right forex broker is critical for experienced retail traders in Taiwan, where access to global markets and local payment methods like Bank Transfer and Credit Card in TWD is essential. FBS (score 3.7/5) and IC Markets (score 4.8/5) are two popular choices, but they cater to different trading styles. FBS is known for its high leverage (up to 1:3000) and user-friendly platforms, making it suitable for those who prioritize flexibility and ease of use. IC Markets, on the other hand, is a top-tier broker for serious traders, offering institutional-grade execution, ultra-low spreads, and deep liquidity. Both brokers accept Taiwan clients and support local Bank Transfer and Credit Card deposits, but IC Markets stands out for its cost efficiency and regulatory strength. This comparison will help you decide which broker aligns with your trading goals, considering the lack of direct FSC Taiwan regulation and the importance of reliable deposit/withdrawal methods.

πŸ†
Overall Scores Comparison
FBS logo
FBS
CySEC Β· IFSC Β· FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
πŸ† Winner
VS
IC Markets logo
IC Markets
ASIC Β· CySEC Β· FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
FBS
IC Markets
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
4.7
4.9
WIN
Platforms
MT4,MT5,cTrader,TV
5.0
WIN
4.5
Regulation
Safety, oversight
5.0
WIN
4.5
Deposits
Local payments
4.5
Tie
4.5
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
4.8
WIN
4.3
Education
Webinars, guides
4.6
WIN
4.0
Execution
Speed, slippage
4.7
5.0
WIN
Mobile App
iOS, Android
4.5
Tie
4.5
πŸ’Ή
Trading Costs β€” Spreads & Commissions
InstrumentFBSIC MarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotIC Markets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalIC Markets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsIC Markets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsIC Markets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$1$200FBS
Inactivity feeβœ“βœ“Tie

For Taiwan traders, trading costs are a major factor, especially for high-volume scalpers and day traders. IC Markets offers a Raw Spread account with spreads from 0.0 pips and a commission of $3.50 per lot round-turn, resulting in significantly lower overall costs. FBS’s ECN account has spreads starting from 0.7 pips with no commission, but the wider spreads add up quickly for frequent traders. For example, trading 10 standard lots per week on EUR/USD, IC Markets would cost approximately $35 in commission, while FBS would incur about $70 in spread costs. This difference can save Taiwan traders thousands of TWD annually. Additionally, IC Markets offers negative balance protection, which is a safety net for volatile markets. FBS may appeal to those who prefer no-commission trading, but the spread cost advantage clearly favors IC Markets for active traders.

πŸ“‚
Account Types Comparison
Account TypeFBSIC Markets
Standard accountβœ“βœ“
ECN / Raw spreadβœ“βœ“
Islamic (swap-free)βœ“βœ“
Demo accountβœ“βœ“
PAMM / MAM accountβœ—βœ“
Zero spread accountβœ—βœ“
Copy tradingβœ—βœ—
VPS tradingβœ—βœ“
Min deposit$1$200
Neg. balance protectionβœ“βœ“
βš–οΈ
Leverage Comparison β€” Taiwan Traders
Entity / AssetFBSIC Markets
Taiwan (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:500
Forex major pairs1:30001:500
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Margin call level80%80%
Stop out level50%50%
⚠️ Leverage Warning for Taiwan Traders
Traders in Taiwan typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk. Most professional traders use 1:50 or less.
πŸ“ˆ
Trading Instruments β€” Assets Available
Asset ClassFBSIC MarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS
Gold (XAU/USD)βœ“βœ“Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)βœ“βœ“Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS
Crypto CFDs30+20+FBS
Stocks / Share CFDsβœ—βœ—IC Markets
ETFsβœ—βœ—Tie
Optionsβœ—βœ—Tie
Futuresβœ—βœ—Tie
πŸ–₯️
Platforms Comparison
PlatformFBSIC Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)βœ“βœ“
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)βœ“βœ“
cTraderβœ—βœ“
TradingViewβœ—βœ—
Expert Advisors (EAs)βœ“βœ“
Scalping allowedβœ“βœ“
Hedging allowedβœ“βœ“
Fixed spreadsβœ“βœ—
Variable spreadsβœ“βœ“

Both brokers offer the industry-standard MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), which are widely used by Taiwan traders for their advanced charting, automated trading, and custom indicators. IC Markets also provides cTrader, a powerful platform with advanced order types and a clean interface, favored by scalpers. FBS offers its proprietary FBS Trader app for mobile trading, but its desktop offering is limited to MT4/MT5. For experienced traders in Taiwan who require fast execution and complex analysis, IC Markets’ cTrader is a strong advantage. FBS’s platform selection is adequate for most retail traders, but lacks the depth and speed that serious traders need.

⚑
Execution Quality β€” Speed & Slippage
FactorFBSIC MarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNIC Markets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Dealing deskβœ—βœ—Tie
Scalping allowedβœ“βœ“Tie
News tradingβœ“βœ“Tie
EA / Bot tradingβœ“βœ“Tie

Execution quality is a key differentiator for experienced traders. IC Markets uses Equinix NY4 data centers and offers low-latency execution with no requotes, making it ideal for scalping and high-frequency trading. FBS execution is reliable for standard trading, but may experience slippage during news events. IC Markets provides a true ECN environment with direct market access, while FBS uses a hybrid model. For Taiwan traders who value speed and precision, IC Markets is the clear winner.

πŸ›‘οΈ
Regulation & Safety for Taiwan Traders
Safety FactorFBSIC Markets
Primary regulatorIFSCASIC
Reg number#IFSC/60/230/TS/19#335692
Verify registrationVerify β†—Verify β†—
Top-tier regulatedβœ—βœ“
Investor protectionβœ“βœ“
Segregated fundsβœ“βœ“
Neg. balance protectionβœ“βœ“

Regulation is a key concern for Taiwan traders, as the FSC Taiwan does not directly oversee international forex brokers. FBS is regulated by the IFSC (Belize) and CySEC (Cyprus), offering moderate investor protection. IC Markets is regulated by ASIC (Australia) and CySEC, providing a higher level of oversight and client fund segregation. For Taiwan traders, IC Markets’ ASIC regulation is particularly reassuring due to Australia’s strict financial standards. While neither broker is licensed by the FSC Taiwan, IC Markets’ stronger regulatory framework reduces counterparty risk. FBS’s regulation is less stringent, which may be a concern for risk-averse traders. Always check current regulatory status, as rules can change.

βœ“ Both brokers are safe for Taiwan traders
Taiwan traders open accounts under offshore entities. Both brokers maintain client fund segregation globally. Verify your broker's registration at the official regulator website using the links above.
πŸ’³
Deposits & Withdrawals for Taiwan
Payment MethodFBSIC Markets
Bank Wire Transferβœ“βœ“
Visa / Mastercardβœ“βœ“
Skrillβœ“βœ“
Netellerβœ“βœ“
USDT / Cryptoβœ“βœ“
Deposit feeNoneNone
Withdrawal time15-20 minutes for most methods; up to 48 hours for bank transferE-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days
Min withdrawal$50$50

Taiwan traders can fund their accounts using Bank Transfer and Credit Card in TWD at both brokers. FBS offers a lower minimum deposit of $5 USD (approx. 160 TWD) and supports additional local payment methods like Skrill, Neteller, and Perfect Money. IC Markets requires a minimum deposit of $200 USD (approx. 6,400 TWD) for its Standard account and $200 for Raw Spread, which may be a barrier for some. Withdrawals are processed efficiently at both brokers, but IC Markets typically processes within 1-2 business days, while FBS may take longer. Bank Transfer fees may apply, so Taiwan traders should check with their local bank. Credit Card deposits are instant at both, but IC Markets does not charge deposit fees, while FBS may have small fees for certain methods. Overall, IC Markets offers faster and more reliable withdrawals, which is crucial for active traders.

β˜ͺ️
Islamic Accounts β€” Swap-Free for Taiwan Muslims
Islamic Account FeatureFBSIC Markets
Swap-free availableβœ“βœ“
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supportedβœ“βœ“
Gold swap-freeβœ“βœ“
Crypto swap-freeβœ“βœ“
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both FBS and IC Markets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Muslim traders in Taiwan who require Sharia-compliant trading. These accounts do not charge overnight interest on positions held beyond the trading day. FBS provides Islamic accounts on request, with no additional fees, but the account type may have reduced leverage. IC Markets also offers Islamic accounts, available for both Standard and Raw Spread accounts, with no swap charges. Taiwan traders must contact customer support to activate the feature and may need to provide a declaration of faith. IC Markets’ Islamic accounts are more transparent and available on all account types, making them a better choice for Muslim traders seeking low-cost, compliant trading.

β˜ͺ️ Islamic Account Note
Both brokers offer swap-free accounts for Muslim traders in Taiwan. Always verify current terms with broker support β€” some instruments may have admin fees after a certain holding period.
🎧
Customer Support Comparison
Support FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
Live chatβœ“βœ“Tie
Phone supportβœ—βœ“Tie
Email supportβœ“βœ“Tie
24/7 supportβœ—βœ—Tie
24/5 supportβœ“βœ“Tie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS

Customer support is available 24/7 for both brokers, with multilingual teams including Chinese and English. IC Markets offers live chat, email, and phone support, with fast response times (under 1 minute for live chat). FBS also provides 24/7 support but has received mixed reviews for response quality. Taiwan traders may prefer IC Markets for its more professional and efficient support, especially when dealing with technical issues or account queries. Both brokers have extensive FAQ sections on their websites, but IC Markets’ support is generally rated higher.

πŸ“±
Mobile App Comparison
Mobile FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5β˜…4.3β˜…FBS
Google Play rating4.3β˜…4.2β˜…FBS
Biometric loginβœ“βœ“Tie
Push notificationsβœ“βœ“Tie
Full charting on mobileβœ“βœ“Tie
Mobile deposit/withdrawalβœ“βœ“Tie
TradingView mobileβœ—βœ—Tie
Dark modeβœ“βœ“Tie
πŸ“š
Education & Research Tools
ResourceFBSIC MarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosFBS
Webinars (live)Weeklyβœ—FBS
Economic calendarβœ“βœ“Tie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS
Beginner resourcesExcellentBasicFBS
⭐
Real User Reviews β€” Trustpilot
T
FBS
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
9.2K
9,222 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot β†—
T
IC Markets
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot β†—
βš–οΈ
Pros & Cons of Each Broker
πŸ”΅ FBS
Pros
βœ“Islamic swap-free account
βœ“Educational resources available
βœ“Expert Advisors (EAs) supported
Cons
βœ—No TradingView integration
βœ—No 24/7 support
βœ—No PAMM accounts
🟒 IC Markets
Pros
βœ“Top-tier regulated (highest safety)
βœ“Islamic swap-free account
βœ“Educational resources available
βœ“Expert Advisors (EAs) supported
βœ“PAMM/MAM accounts available
Cons
βœ—No TradingView integration
βœ—$200 minimum deposit
βœ—No 24/7 support
πŸ‘€
Who Should Use Which Broker? β€” Taiwan Guide

Choose FBS if you...

  • Prefer high leverage (up to 1:3000) for small account trading
  • Want a low minimum deposit ($5 USD) to start trading
  • Need a simple, user-friendly platform with mobile app
  • Are a beginner or casual trader not focused on ultra-tight spreads

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Are an experienced trader seeking institutional-grade execution
  • Want the lowest spreads and commissions for active trading
  • Need advanced platforms like cTrader for scalping and automation
  • Prefer strong regulation (ASIC) and faster withdrawals
❓
FAQ β€” FBS vs IC Markets in Taiwan
Is FBS or IC Markets better for Taiwan? +
Can Taiwan traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Taiwan traders? +
How do Taiwan traders deposit at FBS and IC Markets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Taiwan? +
πŸ† Final Verdict β€” Taiwan 2026
FBS wins overall

For experienced retail traders in Taiwan, IC Markets is the superior choice, earning a 4.8/5 score compared to FBS’s 3.7/5. IC Markets offers lower trading costs, faster execution, stronger regulation (ASIC), and better support, all of which are critical for serious traders. While FBS has its meritsβ€”high leverage and low depositβ€”it falls short in cost efficiency and regulatory safety. Taiwan traders using Bank Transfer and Credit Card in TWD will find both brokers accessible, but IC Markets’ faster withdrawals and lower spreads make it more suitable for active trading. Although neither broker is regulated by the FSC Taiwan, IC Markets’ ASIC oversight provides greater peace of mind. For the best trading experience in Taiwan, IC Markets is the recommended broker.

Open FBS β†’Open IC Markets β†’
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. This comparison is for informational purposes only. CompareBroker.io may receive compensation when you open an account through our links. All data verified as of July 2026.
🎯 Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Taiwan traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers β†’
Score Summary
FBS πŸ†3.7/5
IC Markets 3.6/5
πŸ”— Similar Comparisons
→ Fbs Vs Exness→ Ic Markets Vs Exness→ Fbs Vs Xm Group→ Ic Markets Vs Fp Markets→ Pepperstone Vs Avatrade→ Ic Markets Vs Fp Markets
🌍 Best Brokers in Taiwan
→ Best Forex Brokers→ Best Gold CFD Brokers→ Lowest Spread Brokers→ Best Demo Account
⚠️ Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.