HomeCompareFBS vs IC MarketsSouth Sudan
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
South Sudan
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

FBS vs IC Markets for South Sudan Traders: Which Broker Fits Best?

Which broker is better for South Sudan traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS logo
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA · Founded 2009
Open Account
VS
IC Markets logo
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
Winner: FBS
Categories: 12 compared
For: South Sudan traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — South Sudan Traders

Best Overall
FBS
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
IC Markets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for South Sudan Muslims
Best for Beginners
FBS
Better education & support
$5 vs $200
Min deposit
1:3000 vs 1:5000
Max leverage
CySEC vs ASIC
Top regulator
3.7 vs 3.6
Our scores
Table of Contents

For South Sudan traders looking to enter the forex market, choosing the right broker is critical. FBS and IC Markets are two globally recognized brokers, but they cater to different trader profiles. FBS, with a score of 3.7/5, is known for its low minimum deposit and user-friendly platforms, making it a good starting point for retail traders in South Sudan. IC Markets, scoring 4.8/5, is a top-tier broker favored by experienced traders for its ultra-low spreads, fast execution, and advanced tools. Both brokers accept South Sudan clients and support local payment methods like Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20. However, local regulation is limited, so traders must rely on the brokers’ international licenses. This comparison helps South Sudan traders decide which broker aligns with their trading goals, whether they prioritize cost-efficiency or simplicity.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

FBS
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
IC Markets
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.8
WIN
3.7
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.4
3.8
WIN
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.2
3.9
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.8
WIN
3.7
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.5
WIN
3.4
Education
Webinars, guides
3.8
WIN
3.3
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.8
WIN
3.7
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.7
WIN
3.6
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentFBSIC MarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotIC Markets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalIC Markets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsIC Markets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsIC Markets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$5$200IC Markets

When comparing trading costs, IC Markets clearly outperforms FBS for South Sudan traders. IC Markets offers raw spreads from 0.0 pips on its Raw Spread account, with a commission of $3.50 per lot per side. FBS, on the other hand, has spreads starting from 0.5 pips on its Zero Spread account, but commissions are higher. For a South Sudan trader executing 10 lots per month on EUR/USD, IC Markets could save up to $20–$30 in spread costs compared to FBS. Swap fees also favor IC Markets, which offers competitive overnight rates. FBS may be cheaper for very small accounts due to its no-commission standard accounts, but active traders will benefit from IC Markets’ lower overall costs.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeFBSIC Markets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$5$200
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - South Sudan Traders

Entity / AssetFBSIC Markets
South Sudan (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:5000
Forex major pairs1:30001:5000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for South Sudan Traders
Traders in South Sudan typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassFBSIC MarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS
Crypto CFDs30+20+FBS
Stocks / Share CFDsIC Markets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformFBSIC Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both brokers offer the industry-standard MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 platforms, which are widely used by South Sudan traders. IC Markets also provides cTrader, a platform known for its advanced charting and order execution, ideal for scalpers and algorithmic traders. FBS offers its proprietary FBS Trader app, which is simpler and mobile-friendly, but less feature-rich. For South Sudan traders with limited internet connectivity, IC Markets’ platforms are more stable and offer better performance. FBS may be easier for beginners, but IC Markets’ platform suite is more powerful for serious trading.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorFBSIC MarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNIC Markets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

Execution quality is a key differentiator for South Sudan traders. IC Markets uses Equinix NY4 servers for ultra-fast execution, with average speeds under 40ms. FBS execution is slower, around 100ms, due to its less advanced infrastructure. For scalpers or high-frequency traders in South Sudan, IC Markets’ low latency can mean better fills and less slippage. FBS execution is adequate for swing traders but may cause issues during volatile markets. IC Markets’ No Dealing Desk (NDD) model ensures no re-quotes, while FBS may have requotes on certain account types.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for South Sudan Traders

Safety FactorFBSIC Markets
Primary regulatorIFSCASIC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

Both FBS and IC Markets are regulated by top-tier international authorities, but neither is directly regulated by South Sudan’s local financial regulator. FBS is regulated by the IFSC (Belize) and CySEC (Cyprus), while IC Markets is regulated by ASIC (Australia) and CySEC. For South Sudan traders, this means they are not protected by local investor compensation schemes. However, IC Markets’ ASIC regulation offers strong client fund segregation and transparency. FBS’s regulation is less strict, which may raise concerns for risk-averse traders. South Sudan traders should verify the broker’s current license status and consider using a regulated entity for added security.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for South Sudan traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for South Sudan

Payment MethodFBSIC Markets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeElectronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days.E-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days

South Sudan traders can fund their accounts at both FBS and IC Markets using Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20. FBS also supports local mobile money options like Airtel Money and MTN Mobile Money, which are popular in South Sudan. IC Markets focuses on international e-wallets and crypto, making it easier for traders with access to USDT. Deposits are processed in USD, and most methods are instant or within 24 hours. Withdrawals at FBS are typically free for e-wallets, while IC Markets charges a small fee for bank transfers. For South Sudan traders, using USDT TRC20 is often the fastest and cheapest method, with no bank delays. Both brokers have a minimum deposit of $10–$50, making them accessible.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for South Sudan Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureFBSIC Markets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both FBS and IC Markets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for South Sudan Muslim traders who require Sharia-compliant trading. IC Markets provides Islamic accounts on its Standard and Raw Spread accounts, with no swap charges on overnight positions. FBS offers Islamic accounts on all account types, including cent accounts for small traders. Neither broker charges an additional fee for swap-free status, but IC Markets may require a minimum deposit of $200 for Islamic accounts. South Sudan traders should confirm the terms, as some brokers limit the number of days a position can be held swap-free. Both options are valid for Muslim traders.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS

Customer support is crucial for South Sudan traders, especially when dealing with deposits or platform issues. IC Markets offers 24/7 live chat, email, and phone support in English, with fast response times. FBS provides similar support but with limited hours on weekends. Both brokers have a South Sudan-specific support team available via email. IC Markets is generally more responsive, with average response times under 5 minutes for live chat. FBS may have longer wait times but offers multilingual support, including Arabic, which may benefit some traders.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsFBS
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsFBS
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceFBSIC MarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)WeeklyFBS
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
FBS
★★★★★
9.2K
9,222 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
IC Markets
★★★★★
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

FBS

Pros
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - South Sudan Guide

Choose FBS if you...

  • Are a beginner trader in South Sudan with a small capital
  • Prefer a simple mobile app like FBS Trader
  • Need local mobile money deposit options like Airtel Money
  • Want a low minimum deposit of $10

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Are an active or professional trader in South Sudan
  • Need ultra-low spreads and fast execution
  • Use advanced platforms like cTrader or MT4/MT5
  • Prefer strong regulation under ASIC for added security

FAQ - FBS vs IC Markets in South Sudan

Is FBS or IC Markets better for South Sudan? +
Can South Sudan traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for South Sudan traders? +
How do South Sudan traders deposit at FBS and IC Markets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for South Sudan? +

Final Verdict - South Sudan 2026

FBS wins overall

For South Sudan traders, the choice between FBS and IC Markets depends on experience and trading style. Beginners with small accounts may prefer FBS for its low minimum deposit and local deposit methods like Bank Transfer and mobile money. However, IC Markets offers superior value for active traders with tighter spreads, faster execution, and stronger regulation. Both brokers support USDT TRC20, which is ideal for avoiding bank delays in South Sudan. Ultimately, IC Markets’ higher score (4.8 vs 3.7) and better overall offering make it the recommended choice for most South Sudan traders. Always verify the current regulatory status with the local financial regulator before depositing.

Open FBSOpen IC Markets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for South Sudan traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
FBS Winner3.7/5
IC Markets 3.6/5
Similar Comparisons
Fbs Vs ExnessIc Markets Vs ExnessFbs Vs Xm GroupIc Markets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in South Sudan
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.