HomeCompareFBS vs IC MarketsPoland
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
Poland
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

FBS vs IC Markets for Poland Traders (2026)

Which broker is better for Poland traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS logo
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA · Founded 2009
Open Account
VS
IC Markets logo
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
Winner: FBS
Categories: 12 compared
For: Poland traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Poland Traders

Best Overall
FBS
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
IC Markets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for Poland Muslims
Best for Beginners
FBS
Better education & support
$5 vs $200
Min deposit
1:3000 vs 1:5000
Max leverage
CySEC vs ASIC
Top regulator
3.7 vs 3.6
Our scores
Table of Contents

Poland traders looking for a reliable forex broker often compare FBS and IC Markets, two popular international brokers with different strengths. FBS, scoring 3.7/5, is known for its low minimum deposit and support for local payment methods like BLIK, making it accessible for beginners. IC Markets, with a high score of 4.8/5, is favored by experienced traders for its ultra-tight spreads and institutional-grade execution. Both brokers accept PLN deposits and offer MetaTrader platforms, but they differ in regulation, costs, and account types. For Poland traders, understanding these differences is crucial, especially given that neither broker is regulated by the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF). This comparison will help you decide which broker aligns with your trading goals, whether you prioritize low costs or ease of entry.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

FBS
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
IC Markets
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.8
WIN
3.7
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.4
3.8
WIN
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.2
3.9
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.8
WIN
3.7
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.5
WIN
3.4
Education
Webinars, guides
3.8
WIN
3.3
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.8
WIN
3.7
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.7
WIN
3.6
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentFBSIC MarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotIC Markets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalIC Markets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsIC Markets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsIC Markets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$5$200IC Markets

When comparing trading costs for Poland traders, IC Markets clearly outperforms FBS. IC Markets offers spreads from 0.0 pips on its Raw Spread account with a commission of $7 per lot round turn. FBS spreads start from 0.5 pips on its ECN account with no commission, but the wider spread adds up for high-volume traders. For example, a Poland trader executing 10 lots per month would pay around $70 in commissions at IC Markets versus roughly $100 in spread costs at FBS, assuming average market conditions. Additionally, IC Markets has lower swap rates for overnight positions, which benefits longer-term traders. FBS does offer a fixed spread account for stability, but overall, IC Markets provides better cost efficiency for active Poland traders.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeFBSIC Markets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$5$200
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Poland Traders

Entity / AssetFBSIC Markets
Poland (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:5000
Forex major pairs1:30001:5000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Poland Traders
Traders in Poland typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassFBSIC MarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS
Crypto CFDs30+20+FBS
Stocks / Share CFDsIC Markets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformFBSIC Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both FBS and IC Markets offer the popular MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5) platforms, which are widely used by Poland traders for their advanced charting and automated trading capabilities. IC Markets also provides cTrader, a platform favored for its intuitive interface and depth of market visibility, appealing to tech-savvy traders. FBS offers its own mobile app with social trading features, but it lacks the sophistication of cTrader. For Poland traders who value algorithmic trading, IC Markets has superior API access and lower latency. Both brokers support VPS hosting for uninterrupted trading, but IC Markets’ infrastructure is more robust, making it the better choice for scalpers and high-frequency traders.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorFBSIC MarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNIC Markets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

Execution quality is a major differentiator. IC Markets offers ultra-fast execution with an average latency of under 40ms, thanks to its Equinix NY4 data center and No Dealing Desk (NDD) model. FBS execution is slower, averaging around 100ms, with occasional requotes during volatile markets. For Poland traders using scalping or EA strategies, IC Markets is the clear winner.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Poland Traders

Safety FactorFBSIC Markets
Primary regulatorIFSCASIC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

Regulation is a key consideration for Poland traders. FBS is regulated by the International Financial Services Commission (IFSC) of Belize, which offers limited investor protection. IC Markets is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), providing stronger oversight and client fund segregation. Neither broker is licensed by the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), meaning Poland traders do not have access to the Investor Compensation Scheme (up to €20,000) or the Polish Ombudsman for financial disputes. However, IC Markets’ ASIC regulation is considered more stringent, offering greater transparency. Poland traders should weigh the risk of trading with an unregulated entity against the benefits of lower costs and better features.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Poland traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Poland

Payment MethodFBSIC Markets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeElectronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days.E-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days

Deposits and withdrawals are straightforward for Poland traders at both brokers, but FBS has an edge with local payment methods. FBS supports BLIK, a popular Polish instant payment system, along with Bank Transfer and Credit Card deposits. BLIK deposits are processed instantly with no fees, making it ideal for quick funding. The minimum deposit at FBS is just $5 (about 20 PLN), which is beginner-friendly. IC Markets accepts Bank Transfer and Credit Card deposits, but does not offer BLIK. Its minimum deposit is $200 (around 800 PLN), which may be a barrier for smaller traders. Both brokers process withdrawals within 1-3 business days, though FBS may charge a small fee for certain methods. For Poland traders who value convenience, FBS wins on deposit options, while IC Markets is better for larger deposits.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Poland Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureFBSIC Markets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both FBS and IC Markets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Poland traders who require them due to religious beliefs. FBS provides Islamic accounts upon request, with no swap fees charged on overnight positions. However, FBS may impose a holding period or administrative fee after a certain number of days. IC Markets offers automatic swap-free accounts for clients in Muslim-majority regions, including Poland, with no additional fees. IC Markets’ Islamic accounts are available on all account types, including Raw Spread and Standard, while FBS limits them to specific accounts. For Poland Muslim traders, IC Markets provides a more transparent and cost-effective solution, though both brokers cater to this need.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS

Customer support is available 24/7 from both FBS and IC Markets, with support in Polish. FBS offers live chat, email, and phone support, with quick response times for basic queries. IC Markets provides similar channels but is known for more knowledgeable support agents, especially for technical issues. For Poland traders, IC Markets’ support is slightly more reliable, though FBS is adequate for most needs.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsFBS
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsFBS
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceFBSIC MarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)WeeklyFBS
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
FBS
★★★★★
9.2K
9,222 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
IC Markets
★★★★★
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

FBS

Pros
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Poland Guide

Choose FBS if you...

  • Prefer a low minimum deposit of $5 to start trading with small capital.
  • Want to use BLIK for instant deposits without fees.
  • Are a beginner looking for a simple platform with educational resources.
  • Trade infrequently and don’t mind wider spreads for lower upfront costs.

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Need ultra-tight spreads and low commissions for high-volume trading.
  • Use automated trading strategies or scalping requiring fast execution.
  • Value stronger regulation (ASIC, CySEC) and client fund protection.
  • Prefer advanced platforms like cTrader and VPS hosting for reliability.

FAQ - FBS vs IC Markets in Poland

Is FBS or IC Markets better for Poland? +
Can Poland traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Poland traders? +
How do Poland traders deposit at FBS and IC Markets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Poland? +

Final Verdict - Poland 2026

FBS wins overall

For Poland traders, the choice between FBS and IC Markets depends on your trading style and priorities. IC Markets is the superior broker for active, tech-savvy traders who need low costs, fast execution, and robust regulation. Its 4.8/5 score reflects industry-leading features, though the lack of BLIK and higher minimum deposit may deter some. FBS, with a 3.7/5 score, is a solid entry-level option for Poland beginners, thanks to its BLIK support, low deposit, and local payment convenience. However, its wider spreads and weaker regulation (no KNF oversight) limit its appeal for serious traders. Consider your volume, platform needs, and deposit preferences before deciding. For most Poland traders, IC Markets offers better long-term value.

Open FBSOpen IC Markets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Poland traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
FBS Winner3.7/5
IC Markets 3.6/5
Similar Comparisons
Fbs Vs ExnessIc Markets Vs ExnessFbs Vs Xm GroupIc Markets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in Poland
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.