HomeCompareFBS vs IC MarketsJapan
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
Japan
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

FBS vs IC Markets for Japan Traders (2026)

Which broker is better for Japan traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS logo
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA · Founded 2009
Open Account
VS
IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
Winner: FBS
Categories: 12 compared
For: Japan traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Japan Traders

Best Overall
FBS
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
IC Markets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for Japan Muslims
Best for Beginners
FBS
Better education & support
$5 vs $200
Min deposit
1:3000 vs 1:5000
Max leverage
CySEC vs ASIC
Top regulator
3.7 vs 3.6
Our scores
Table of Contents

For Japan traders comparing FBS vs IC Markets in 2025, the choice often comes down to regulation, costs, and local payment methods. FBS holds a score of 3.7/5 and is popular among retail traders for its low minimum deposit and flexible account types. IC Markets, with a higher score of 4.8/5, is favored by sophisticated traders for its institutional-grade execution and tight spreads. Both brokers accept Japanese clients and support Bank Transfer and Credit Card deposits in JPY. However, given Japan's strict financial environment—where the FSA Japan sets high standards—traders must weigh each broker's regulatory status and cost structure carefully. IC Markets' ECN model appeals to scalpers and algorithmic traders, while FBS offers more accessible trading for beginners. This comparison covers spreads, platforms, regulation, and local payment options to help you decide which broker aligns with your trading style in Japan.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

FBS
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.8
WIN
3.7
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.4
3.8
WIN
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.2
3.9
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.8
WIN
3.7
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.5
WIN
3.4
Education
Webinars, guides
3.8
WIN
3.3
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.8
WIN
3.7
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.7
WIN
3.6
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentFBSIC MarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotIC Markets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalIC Markets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsIC Markets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsIC Markets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$5$200IC Markets

For Japan traders, trading costs are a critical factor, especially for high-frequency strategies. IC Markets offers spreads from 0.0 pips on its Raw Spread account with a commission of $3.5 per lot round turn. FBS starts at 0.5 pips on its ECN account with no commission, but spreads widen during volatile periods. On a standard lot of USD/JPY, IC Markets can save you 50-100 JPY per trade compared to FBS. Over 100 trades per month, this difference adds up significantly. IC Markets also has lower swap rates for JPY pairs, benefiting swing traders. FBS may be cheaper for small lot sizes due to its lower minimum deposit, but for volume traders, IC Markets is more cost-effective in Japan.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeFBSIC Markets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$5$200
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Japan Traders

Entity / AssetFBSIC Markets
Japan (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:5000
Forex major pairs1:30001:5000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Japan Traders
Traders in Japan typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassFBSIC MarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS
Crypto CFDs30+20+FBS
Stocks / Share CFDsIC Markets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformFBSIC Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both brokers offer MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, which are widely used by Japan traders. IC Markets also provides cTrader, a powerful platform with advanced charting and order management—ideal for sophisticated traders. FBS lacks cTrader but offers the FBS Trader app for mobile trading. IC Markets supports automated trading via VPS with low latency, crucial for Japan traders running EAs. FBS also supports EAs but with less robust infrastructure. For Japan traders who value platform variety and speed, IC Markets has the edge. FBS is sufficient for manual traders who prefer simplicity.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorFBSIC MarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNIC Markets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

IC Markets offers true ECN execution with no dealer intervention, providing average execution speeds under 40ms. This is ideal for Japan traders using scalping or high-frequency strategies. FBS uses a hybrid model with some dealing desk intervention, leading to occasional requotes. IC Markets' execution is more reliable for volatile JPY pairs, while FBS may be acceptable for slower trading styles. For sophisticated traders in Japan, IC Markets' execution quality is a clear advantage.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Japan Traders

Safety FactorFBSIC Markets
Primary regulatorIFSCASIC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

Regulation is a top concern for Japan traders due to the FSA Japan's strict oversight. Neither FBS nor IC Markets is directly regulated by the FSA Japan, but both hold licenses from reputable authorities. IC Markets is regulated by ASIC (Australia) and CySEC (Cyprus), offering strong client fund segregation. FBS is regulated by the IFSC (Belize) and CySEC, which provides less investor protection. For Japan traders, IC Markets' ASIC regulation is closer to the FSA Japan's standards, offering negative balance protection and compensation schemes. FBS has a lower regulatory tier, which may concern risk-averse traders. Always check each broker's current licensing status for Japan.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Japan traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Japan

Payment MethodFBSIC Markets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeElectronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days.E-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days

Japan traders can fund both FBS and IC Markets using Bank Transfer and Credit Card, with JPY accepted. IC Markets requires a minimum deposit of $200 (approx 30,000 JPY), while FBS allows as little as $5 (approx 750 JPY). Bank Transfer deposits at IC Markets take 1-3 business days, while Credit Card is instant. FBS processes Credit Card deposits instantly and Bank Transfer within 1-2 days. Withdrawals are similar: IC Markets processes within 1-2 business days for Bank Transfer, and FBS takes 2-5 business days. IC Markets does not charge deposit fees, but FBS may apply a small fee for certain payment methods. Japan traders should also note that IC Markets supports additional e-wallets like PayPal, which are popular locally.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Japan Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureFBSIC Markets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Muslim traders in Japan can use Islamic (swap-free) accounts at both FBS and IC Markets. FBS offers swap-free accounts upon request, with no interest charges on overnight positions. IC Markets provides Islamic accounts automatically for clients from Muslim-majority regions, including Japan, with no swap fees on major pairs. However, IC Markets may apply a small administrative fee after a holding period. FBS does not charge additional fees for Islamic accounts. Japan traders should confirm with customer support to ensure the account meets Sharia requirements and understand any terms that might affect long-term positions.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS

Both brokers offer customer support in English and Japanese. IC Markets provides 24/7 live chat, email, and phone support, with fast response times (under 2 minutes). FBS also offers 24/7 support but with slightly slower responses (3-5 minutes). For Japan traders, IC Markets' Japanese-speaking team is more responsive and knowledgeable about local trading conditions. FBS support is adequate but may have language limitations during peak hours. Overall, IC Markets has a stronger support infrastructure for Japan.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsFBS
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsFBS
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceFBSIC MarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)WeeklyFBS
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
FBS
★★★★★
9.2K
9,222 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
IC Markets
★★★★★
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

FBS

Pros
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Japan Guide

Choose FBS if you...

  • Have a small starting capital (as low as 750 JPY)
  • Prefer simple trading without complex platforms
  • Want a swap-free account with no additional fees
  • Are a beginner or casual trader in Japan

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Are a sophisticated trader needing low spreads
  • Trade high volume or use automated systems
  • Value strong regulation (ASIC) and fast execution
  • Prefer multiple platforms like cTrader and MT4/5

FAQ - FBS vs IC Markets in Japan

Is FBS or IC Markets better for Japan? +
Can Japan traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Japan traders? +
How do Japan traders deposit at FBS and IC Markets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Japan? +

Final Verdict - Japan 2026

FBS wins overall

For Japan traders in 2025, the choice between FBS and IC Markets depends on your trading style and budget. IC Markets (4.8/5) is the better option for sophisticated traders who prioritize low spreads, fast execution, and robust regulation—close to FSA Japan standards. It supports Bank Transfer and Credit Card deposits in JPY, making it convenient for local traders. FBS (3.7/5) is a more accessible choice for beginners with a low minimum deposit and simple account setup, but its higher spreads and weaker regulation may not suit advanced needs. Ultimately, IC Markets offers superior value for active traders in Japan, while FBS is a viable entry-level broker. Always verify current terms with each broker before opening an account.

Open FBSOpen IC Markets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Japan traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
FBS Winner3.7/5
IC Markets 3.6/5
Similar Comparisons
Fbs Vs ExnessIc Markets Vs ExnessFbs Vs Xm GroupIc Markets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in Japan
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.