Which broker is better for China traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
For China traders looking to access global forex markets, EasyMarkets and Pepperstone are two well-known offshore brokers, but they cater to different needs. EasyMarkets (score 3.4/5) is known for its fixed spreads and user-friendly risk management tools, while Pepperstone (score 4.9/5) is a market leader in low-cost, high-speed execution with a range of platforms including MT4, MT5, and cTrader. Chinese traders often operate outside CSRC regulation, relying on international licenses from FCA, ASIC, or CySEC. Both brokers accept local payment methods such as USDT and international bank transfers, making them accessible despite China’s capital controls. This comparison focuses on key factors for offshore Chinese traders: spreads, deposit speed, platform suitability, and regulatory safety. Whether you prioritize predictable costs or razor-thin spreads, understanding these differences will help you choose the right broker for international exposure in 2025.
| Instrument | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | Pepperstone |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | Pepperstone |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | Pepperstone |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | Pepperstone |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $25 | $0 | Pepperstone |
When comparing trading costs for China traders, Pepperstone clearly outperforms EasyMarkets. Pepperstone’s Razor account offers spreads from 0.0 pips on majors with a low commission of $3.50 per lot round turn, making it ideal for high-volume scalpers. EasyMarkets uses fixed spreads that are wider—typically 1.2 pips on EUR/USD—but with no commission, which can benefit smaller traders who dislike variable costs. For China traders trading 10+ lots per month, Pepperstone’s lower spreads can save hundreds of dollars annually. However, EasyMarkets’ fixed spreads provide cost certainty, useful in volatile markets where spreads might widen elsewhere.
| Account Type | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $25 | $0 |
| Entity / Asset | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| China (offshore) | Up to 1:2000 | Up to 1:1000 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:2000 | 1:1000 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | EasyMarkets |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | EasyMarkets |
| Crypto CFDs | 30+ | 20+ | EasyMarkets |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | ✗ | Pepperstone |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✗ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✗ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✓ |
| TradingView | ✗ | ✓ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Both brokers support MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, the industry standards favored by Chinese traders for their custom indicators and automated trading. Pepperstone also offers cTrader, a modern platform with advanced order types and depth of market, which some Chinese traders prefer for scalping. EasyMarkets provides its proprietary web platform and mobile app, but these are less feature-rich than MT4/MT5. For China traders who rely on Expert Advisors (EAs) or need multi-platform access, Pepperstone is the stronger choice. EasyMarkets’ proprietary platform is simpler but lacks advanced charting tools.
| Factor | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | Pepperstone |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | EasyMarkets |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
Pepperstone is known for its ultra-fast execution with no dealing desk (NDD) and average speeds under 40ms. This is crucial for Chinese scalpers and EA traders. EasyMarkets uses a dealing desk for standard accounts, which may lead to requotes and slippage during volatile markets. However, EasyMarkets offers a ‘deal or no deal’ execution on its VIP account, which provides fixed spreads but still slower execution than Pepperstone. For high-frequency trading, Pepperstone is clearly superior. For occasional traders, EasyMarkets’ execution is acceptable.
| Safety Factor | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | CySEC | FCA |
| Top-tier regulated | ✓ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Neither EasyMarkets nor Pepperstone is regulated by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). Instead, Pepperstone is regulated by top-tier authorities like the FCA (UK) and ASIC (Australia), offering strong client fund segregation and compensation schemes. EasyMarkets is regulated by CySEC (Cyprus) and ASIC, but its CySEC status provides weaker protection under EU rules (limited leverage). For China traders, Pepperstone’s regulatory framework is more robust, especially for those trading large volumes. However, both brokers must be accessed via international entities, meaning no local dispute resolution. Chinese traders should verify the specific entity they open an account with (e.g., Pepperstone's offshore entity in Seychelles offers lower protection).
| Payment Method | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neteller | ✓ | ✓ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✗ | ✓ |
| Withdrawal time | Cards 1-2 business days; e-wallets instant-1 business day; bank wire 3-10 business days; overall back-office processing within 1 business day (24h) | 24 hours to 5 business days if submitted before 07:00 AEST |
China traders can fund accounts at both brokers using USDT (Tether) and international bank transfers (SWIFT). USDT deposits are processed instantly with no fees from the broker, making them the fastest option. Bank transfers typically take 2-5 business days and incur intermediary bank charges (around $20-40). EasyMarkets also accepts credit/debit cards and e-wallets like Skrill, but these may have limits for Chinese users. Pepperstone offers a wider range of local payment options via third-party processors, including Alipay and WeChat Pay in some cases (though availability varies). Withdrawals are processed within 1 business day for USDT, while bank transfers take 2-5 days. Both brokers require verification before the first withdrawal. For Chinese traders, USDT is recommended to avoid currency conversion delays.
| Islamic Account Feature | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
Both EasyMarkets and Pepperstone provide Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Muslim traders in China. EasyMarkets offers Islamic accounts on request with no overnight swap charges on all instruments. Pepperstone also offers swap-free accounts but requires a minimum deposit (usually $200) and may restrict certain instruments like indices or commodities. Pepperstone’s policy is stricter—Islamic accounts are not available for all account types (e.g., not on Razor accounts). Chinese Muslim traders should contact support to confirm eligibility. EasyMarkets’ Islamic account is more straightforward with fewer restrictions, making it a better option for those prioritizing Sharia compliance.
| Support Feature | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | EasyMarkets |
EasyMarkets provides 24/5 live chat, email, and phone support in English and Chinese (Mandarin). Pepperstone also offers 24/5 support with multilingual team including Chinese language support via live chat and email. Both brokers have responsive service, but Pepperstone’s support is generally rated faster and more knowledgeable regarding technical issues. Chinese traders should note that support hours are based on international time zones, so weekend coverage is limited. Neither broker offers 24/7 phone support.
| Mobile Feature | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | EasyMarkets |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | EasyMarkets |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✗ | ✓ | Pepperstone |
| Resource | EasyMarkets | Pepperstone | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | Monthly | Tie |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | EasyMarkets |
Choose EasyMarkets if you...
Choose Pepperstone if you...
For China traders seeking international forex exposure in 2025, Pepperstone is the clear winner with a 4.9/5 rating against EasyMarkets’ 3.4/5. Pepperstone offers lower spreads, faster execution, and better platform diversity—all critical for active traders using USDT or bank transfers. While EasyMarkets has strengths in fixed spreads and beginner-friendly tools, its higher costs and slower execution limit its appeal. However, both are offshore brokers not regulated by CSRC, so Chinese traders must accept the risks. For most traders, Pepperstone provides the best value. Still, if you prioritize predictable costs and simpler accounts, EasyMarkets remains a viable option. Always use USDT for deposits to avoid bank delays.