EasyMarkets vs Exness Comparison for China Traders (2026)

For China traders, trading costs are a primary concern, especially when leveraging USDT or bank transfers to fund accounts. Exness consistently offers lower spreads than EasyMarkets across major forex pairs. On the popular EUR/USD, Exness’s Raw Spread account yields spreads from 0.1 pips with a commission of $3.50 per lot, while EasyMarkets’ fixed spread is 1.2 pips with no commission. For a trader executing 10 standard lots daily, Exness saves approximately $110 per day in spread costs. EasyMarkets does offer fixed spreads that protect against widening during news events, but at a premium. Swap fees also differ: Exness has competitive overnight rates, whereas EasyMarkets charges higher swap on long positions. Volume-based traders will see greater savings with Exness, especially when trading larger sizes. China traders with high frequency should opt for Exness to minimize costs.

Both brokers provide MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), which are standard choices for China traders. Exness also offers its own web platform and mobile apps with advanced charting and one-click trading. EasyMarkets provides a proprietary web platform that includes its unique dealCancellation tool, allowing traders to reverse losing trades within one hour. For China traders, MT4/MT5 compatibility is essential for using Expert Advisors (EAs) and custom indicators. Exness supports VPS hosting for algorithmic traders, while EasyMarkets does not offer VPS directly. Platform stability and execution speed are vital for offshore traders; Exness’s infrastructure is built for low latency, while EasyMarkets may experience minor lag during high volatility. Overall, Exness provides a more robust platform ecosystem for China traders who rely on automated strategies or require fast order execution.

Execution quality directly affects trading profitability, especially for scalpers and news traders. Exness uses a combination of STP and ECN execution with no dealing desk intervention, offering instant execution and low latency. EasyMarkets uses a market maker model with fixed spreads, which can result in re-quotes during volatile markets. For China traders trading major pairs like USD/CNH or EUR/USD, Exness’s execution speed averages under 20ms, while EasyMarkets may experience delays up to 100ms. Exness also offers a guaranteed stop loss feature on certain accounts. Overall, Exness provides superior execution for China traders who require fast, reliable order fills.

EasyMarkets is regulated by CySEC (Cyprus), ASIC (Australia), and the FSA (Seychelles). Exness holds licenses from the FCA (UK), CySEC, FSA (Seychelles), and other Tier-1 regulators. Neither broker is regulated by the CSRC in China. For China traders, this means client funds are protected under the jurisdictions where the broker is licensed—Exness offers FCA protection up to £85,000 per client, while EasyMarkets’ CySEC coverage is EUR 20,000 under ICF. Both brokers use segregated accounts and negative balance protection. However, Exness’s higher regulatory standing (FCA) gives China traders an edge in trust and dispute resolution. Because Chinese authorities do not oversee offshore forex activity, traders must choose a broker with strong external regulation. Exness’s multi-jurisdictional licensing provides greater peace of mind for China residents trading from international accounts.

For China traders, deposit and withdrawal flexibility is paramount due to capital controls. Both EasyMarkets and Exness support USDT (Tether) and international bank transfers as primary local payment methods. EasyMarkets offers USDT deposits via its e-wallet system, with processing times within 24 hours and no additional fees. Exness also accepts USDT and processes withdrawals instantly in many cases, with no internal charges, though bank transfers may incur intermediary fees. For international bank transfers, both brokers require SWIFT transfers, which can take 3-5 business days and carry fees of $20-$50. Exness stands out by offering multiple cryptocurrency options beyond USDT, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, expanding access for China traders. However, EasyMarkets has a minimum deposit of $25 for USDT, while Exness requires $10. For withdrawal, Exness often processes requests within minutes for e-wallets and USDT, while EasyMarkets may take up to a day. China traders prioritizing speed and low cost should prefer Exness for deposits and withdrawals.

Both brokers offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts to accommodate Muslim traders in China who follow Sharia law. EasyMarkets provides swap-free accounts automatically when requested via support, covering all instruments with no interest on overnight positions. Exness offers Islamic accounts on Standard, Raw Spread, and Zero accounts, with no swap charges for positions held overnight. However, both brokers may apply a spread adjustment after a certain holding period (e.g., 5-10 days) to compensate for the lack of swap. For China Muslim traders, Exness’s policy is more transparent, with clear documentation on when adjustments occur. EasyMarkets does not mention such adjustments publicly, requiring confirmation from support. Overall, Exness provides a more reliable Islamic account offering with broader availability, while EasyMarkets also supports the requirement but with less clarity.

Customer support in Chinese language is critical for China traders. Exness offers 24/7 live chat and email support in Mandarin Chinese, with phone support available during business hours. EasyMarkets provides 24/5 live chat and email support, but Chinese language support is not always available—traders may need to use English. Exness also has a Chinese-language help center and FAQs. For time-sensitive issues like deposit or withdrawal problems, Exness’s round-the-clock Chinese support gives it a clear advantage over EasyMarkets, especially for offshore traders in China who may trade during Asian hours.