Which broker is better for Australia traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
Australian traders seeking ASIC-regulated brokers face a clear choice between FBS and IG in 2025. FBS, with a score of 3.7/5, is a global broker offering competitive leverage up to 1:30 under ASIC, but its focus is on retail traders with simpler needs. IG, scoring 4.2/5, is a market leader with over 40 years of history, offering advanced tools, tighter spreads, and a comprehensive range of markets including forex, indices, and commodities. For experienced Australian traders, IG's robust platform (ProRealTime, MT4) and local payment methods like BPAY and POLi make it a standout. However, FBS appeals to those wanting higher leverage on smaller accounts. This comparison dives into costs, regulation, deposits, and execution to help you decide which broker aligns with your trading style in the Australian market.
| Instrument | FBS | IG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | IG |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | IG |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | IG |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | IG |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $5 | $0 | IG |
For Australian traders, trading costs are a critical factor. IG offers spreads from 0.6 pips on AUD/USD with its Raw account, while FBS starts at 1.0 pips on its Standard account. Over 100 trades per month, IG's tighter spreads can save an experienced trader over $200 AUD in commission costs, depending on volume. FBS may have lower initial spreads on its Cent account, but for serious traders, IG's cost structure is more favorable. Both brokers charge no deposit fees for BPAY or POLi, but IG's lower spreads and transparent commission model (e.g., $7 AUD per lot) give it an edge for high-volume Australian traders.
| Account Type | FBS | IG |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $5 | $0 |
| Entity / Asset | FBS | IG |
|---|---|---|
| Australia (offshore) | Up to 1:3000 | Up to 1:30 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:3000 | 1:30 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | FBS | IG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | FBS |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | FBS |
| Crypto CFDs | 30+ | 20+ | FBS |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | 1,700+ | IG |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
| Platform | FBS | IG |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✓ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✓ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✗ |
| TradingView | ✗ | ✓ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
IG provides Australian traders with a choice of platforms: its proprietary web platform, MetaTrader 4 (MT4), and ProRealTime for advanced charting. This flexibility suits both beginners and professionals. FBS offers MT4 and its own web trader, but lacks the depth of IG's tools. For experienced Australian traders who rely on automated strategies or in-depth analysis, IG's platform ecosystem is superior. FBS's platform is simpler and may appeal to traders who prefer a lightweight interface, but IG's advanced order types and risk management tools are better for active trading.
| Factor | FBS | IG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | IG |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | FBS |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
IG offers superior execution quality for Australian traders, with no requotes and average execution speeds under 50ms on major pairs. FBS execution is reliable but slightly slower, with occasional slippage during high volatility. For experienced traders who rely on precise entry and exit, IG's execution is more consistent, particularly during news events like RBA announcements.
| Safety Factor | FBS | IG |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | IFSC | FCA |
| Top-tier regulated | ✗ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Both FBS and IG are regulated by ASIC, ensuring Australian traders have access to client fund segregation and dispute resolution through the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). IG holds an AFSL (Number 220440) and is publicly listed on the London Stock Exchange, adding a layer of transparency. FBS operates under an ASIC licence but has a shorter track record in Australia. For experienced traders, IG's stronger regulatory history and financial stability provide greater peace of mind, especially when trading larger volumes. ASIC's leverage cap of 1:30 applies to both brokers, protecting retail clients from excessive risk.
| Payment Method | FBS | IG |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✓ | ✗ |
| Neteller | ✓ | ✗ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✓ | ✓ |
| Withdrawal time | Electronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days. | 1 to 5 business days |
Australian traders can deposit and withdraw funds easily with both brokers using local methods. FBS supports BPAY, POLi, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card, with a minimum deposit of $50 AUD. IG also offers these methods, with a $100 AUD minimum, and processes POLi deposits instantly. Withdrawals at IG are typically processed within 1-2 business days via bank transfer, while FBS may take 2-5 days. FBS charges no fees for BPAY or POLi deposits, but credit card deposits incur a 2.5% fee. IG waives all deposit fees for Australian traders. For active traders, IG's faster withdrawal times and lower fees make it more convenient.
| Islamic Account Feature | FBS | IG |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
Both FBS and IG offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Australian Muslim traders who wish to trade without earning or paying interest (riba). FBS provides Islamic accounts on request, with no swap fees on overnight positions, but may require a minimum deposit of $100 AUD. IG also offers Islamic accounts, but they are limited to certain account types (e.g., Standard accounts) and are subject to approval. IG's Islamic accounts are ASIC-compliant and include access to all major markets. For Australian traders, IG's more established Islamic account offering may be preferable, though both brokers cater to this need effectively.
| Support Feature | FBS | IG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | FBS |
IG provides 24/5 customer support in English, with a dedicated Australian phone line and live chat. FBS offers 24/7 support via live chat and email, but its local Australian presence is weaker. For Australian traders, IG's faster response times and local support team (based in Sydney) are a significant advantage, especially for resolving account or trading issues quickly.
| Mobile Feature | FBS | IG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | FBS |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | FBS |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✗ | ✓ | IG |
| Resource | FBS | IG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | Monthly | Tie |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | FBS |
Choose FBS if you...
Choose IG if you...
For Australian traders seeking an ASIC-regulated broker in 2025, IG is the superior choice, scoring 4.2/5 against FBS's 3.7/5. IG's tighter spreads, robust platform options, and local payment methods like BPAY and POLi make it ideal for experienced traders. While FBS offers a lower entry barrier and higher leverage, its wider spreads and slower execution fall short for active traders. Considering the Australian trading environment, where cost efficiency and regulatory trust are paramount, IG's proven track record and comprehensive features give it a clear edge. Whether you're trading AUD/USD or diversifying into indices, IG provides the tools and support to succeed in the Australian market.