Which broker is better for New Zealand traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
New Zealand traders looking for a reliable forex broker often compare FBS and Forex.com. Both are well-known globally, but they cater to different needs. FBS, with a score of 3.7/5, is popular for its low minimum deposit (just $5) and support for local payment methods like Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20. Forex.com, scoring 3.4/5, is a more established broker with strong regulatory oversight from the local financial regulator, making it a safer choice for risk-averse traders. In 2025, New Zealand retail traders value low costs, fast withdrawals, and local payment flexibility. This comparison breaks down spreads, platforms, regulation, and deposit options to help you decide which broker fits your trading style. Whether you trade part-time or full-time, understanding these differences is key to maximising your returns in the New Zealand forex market.
| Instrument | FBS | Forex.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | Forex.com |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | Forex.com |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | Forex.com |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | Forex.com |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $5 | $100 | Forex.com |
For New Zealand traders, trading costs directly impact profitability. FBS offers spreads from 0.7 pips on its Zero account, with a commission of $6 per lot. Forex.com’s standard account has spreads starting at 1.2 pips with no commission, but overall costs are higher for frequent traders. On a $10,000 monthly volume, FBS can save you around $50 in spreads compared to Forex.com. Swap rates also differ: FBS has competitive overnight fees, while Forex.com charges higher for long-term positions. New Zealand traders should consider their trading frequency and account size when comparing these costs.
| Account Type | FBS | Forex.com |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $5 | $100 |
| Entity / Asset | FBS | Forex.com |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand (offshore) | Up to 1:3000 | Up to 1:50 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:3000 | 1:50 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | FBS | Forex.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | FBS |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | FBS |
| Crypto CFDs | 30+ | 20+ | FBS |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | ✗ | Forex.com |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | FBS | Forex.com |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✓ | ✗ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✓ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✓ |
| TradingView | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Both brokers provide MetaTrader 4 and 5, which are popular among New Zealand traders. FBS also offers its own web and mobile platforms with one-click trading and advanced charting. Forex.com provides TradingView integration, a big plus for technical traders. For New Zealand users, platform speed and reliability are critical due to local internet conditions. FBS’s mobile app is lightweight and works well on slower connections, while Forex.com’s desktop platform is more feature-rich but requires stable internet. Demo accounts are available at both brokers for practice.
| Factor | FBS | Forex.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | Forex.com |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | FBS |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✓ | ✗ | Tie |
Execution quality matters for New Zealand traders, especially during volatile sessions. FBS uses an STP/ECN model with average execution speeds of 0.3 seconds. Forex.com offers similar speeds but with a slight edge in reliability during news events. Both brokers have no requotes on most orders. FBS’s execution is competitive for scalpers, while Forex.com’s stability suits longer-term traders in the New Zealand time zone.
| Safety Factor | FBS | Forex.com |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | IFSC | FCA |
| Top-tier regulated | ✗ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Regulation is crucial for New Zealand traders. Forex.com is regulated by the local financial regulator, the Financial Markets Authority (FMA), offering strong investor protection and negative balance protection. FBS is regulated internationally (IFSC, FSC) but not directly by the FMA. This means Forex.com provides a higher level of security for New Zealand clients, including access to the local dispute resolution scheme. FBS compensates with a more flexible trading environment and lower entry barriers. Traders should weigh regulatory safety against trading freedom when choosing.
| Payment Method | FBS | Forex.com |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✓ | ✗ |
| Neteller | ✓ | ✗ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✓ | ✗ |
| Withdrawal time | Electronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days. | 1 to 3 business days |
New Zealand traders benefit from multiple deposit and withdrawal options at both brokers. FBS supports Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20, with most deposits processed instantly and no fees. Withdrawals are also fast, typically within 24 hours for e-wallets. Forex.com offers the same methods but may charge a 1% fee on Skrill deposits. Bank transfers can take 1-3 business days at both brokers. USDT TRC20 is a standout feature for crypto-savvy New Zealand traders, allowing near-instant deposits with low network fees. Overall, FBS has a slight edge for speed and cost on withdrawals.
| Islamic Account Feature | FBS | Forex.com |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✓ | ✗ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
For New Zealand Muslim traders, both FBS and Forex.com offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts. FBS provides swap-free status on all account types upon request, with no expiry or hidden fees. Forex.com offers Islamic accounts only on standard accounts and may charge a small administration fee after 30 days. New Zealand traders should confirm eligibility with customer support before opening, as local regulations may affect swap-free availability. FBS is generally more accommodating for long-term swap-free trading.
| Support Feature | FBS | Forex.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | FBS |
Customer support is available 24/7 at both brokers via live chat, email, and phone. FBS offers support in English and several other languages, with fast response times. Forex.com provides dedicated support for New Zealand clients with local phone numbers and extended hours. For New Zealand traders, Forex.com’s localised support can be more helpful for account-specific issues, while FBS’s multilingual team is useful for diverse traders.
| Mobile Feature | FBS | Forex.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | FBS |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | FBS |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Resource | FBS | Forex.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | Monthly | Tie |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | FBS |
Choose FBS if you...
Choose Forex.com if you...
For New Zealand traders in 2025, the choice between FBS and Forex.com depends on priorities. FBS wins on low costs, flexible deposits (including USDT TRC20 and Skrill), and Islamic account options. Its 3.7/5 score reflects strong value for retail traders. Forex.com, with a 3.4/5 score, offers superior local regulation from the FMA, making it safer for larger accounts. If you prioritise low fees and fast withdrawals, FBS is the better pick. If regulatory security and advanced platforms matter more, Forex.com is the safer choice. Both brokers support Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20, so you can start trading with confidence.