HomeCompareFBS vs EasyMarketsZambia
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
Zambia
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

FBS vs EasyMarkets: Comprehensive Comparison for Zambia Traders (2026)

Which broker is better for Zambia traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS logo
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA · Founded 2009
Open Account
VS
EasyMarkets logo
EasyMarkets
CySEC · ASIC · FSA · Founded 2001
Open Account
Winner: FBS
Categories: 12 compared
For: Zambia traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Zambia Traders

Best Overall
FBS
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
EasyMarkets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for Zambia Muslims
Best for Beginners
FBS
Better education & support
$5 vs $25
Min deposit
1:3000 vs 1:2000
Max leverage
CySEC vs CySEC
Top regulator
3.7 vs 3.4
Our scores
Table of Contents

Zambian traders seeking a reliable forex broker in 2025 often compare FBS and EasyMarkets due to their strong global reputations and tailored services. FBS, with a score of 3.7/5, excels in offering low spreads, high leverage, and diverse account types, making it a favorite among active traders. EasyMarkets, rated 3.4/5, stands out for its user-friendly platform, fixed spreads, and robust risk management tools like dealCancellation. For Zambia traders, both brokers accept local payment methods such as Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20, ensuring seamless deposits and withdrawals. While neither is locally regulated by the Zambian financial regulator, they operate under reputable international licenses, providing a secure trading environment. This comparison will help you decide which broker aligns with your trading style, budget, and local needs.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

FBS
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
EasyMarkets
EasyMarkets
CySEC · ASIC · FSA
3.4
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.8
WIN
3.5
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.4
WIN
3.1
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.2
3.7
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.8
WIN
3.5
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.5
WIN
3.2
Education
Webinars, guides
3.8
WIN
3.5
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.8
WIN
3.2
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.7
WIN
3.4
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentFBSEasyMarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotEasyMarkets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalEasyMarkets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsEasyMarkets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsEasyMarkets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$5$25EasyMarkets

When comparing trading costs for Zambia traders, FBS generally offers lower variable spreads, especially on its ECN account (from 0.0 pips plus commission), which suits high-volume scalpers. EasyMarkets uses fixed spreads averaging 1.0-1.5 pips on major pairs like EUR/USD, providing cost predictability but higher overall costs. For a trader executing 10 standard lots per month, FBS can save approximately $50-$100 in spreads compared to EasyMarkets, depending on market conditions. However, EasyMarkets charges no commission on standard accounts, while FBS's ECN account has a commission. Consider your trading volume and style: FBS for cost efficiency, EasyMarkets for budget certainty.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeFBSEasyMarkets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$5$25
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Zambia Traders

Entity / AssetFBSEasyMarkets
Zambia (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:2000
Forex major pairs1:30001:2000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Zambia Traders
Traders in Zambia typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS
Crypto CFDs30+20+FBS
Stocks / Share CFDsEasyMarkets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformFBSEasyMarkets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

FBS offers MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, powerful platforms with advanced charting, automated trading, and custom indicators, ideal for experienced Zambia traders. EasyMarkets provides its proprietary web-based platform and mobile app, which are simpler and more intuitive, featuring unique tools like dealCancellation and price freeze. For Zambia traders who value flexibility and analysis, FBS's MT4/MT5 are superior. For beginners or those who prefer a hassle-free experience, EasyMarkets' platform is more accessible. Both are available on desktop, web, and mobile, ensuring you can trade from Lusaka or anywhere in Zambia.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNEasyMarkets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

FBS uses No Dealing Desk (NDD) execution on its ECN accounts, offering fast order processing with minimal requotes, ideal for scalpers and high-frequency traders. EasyMarkets uses market execution with fixed spreads, which can lead to occasional slippage during volatile news events. For Zambia traders trading major pairs like USD/ZMW, FBS provides more reliable execution, while EasyMarkets' fixed spreads offer price certainty. Overall, FBS wins on execution speed and flexibility.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Zambia Traders

Safety FactorFBSEasyMarkets
Primary regulatorIFSCCySEC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

FBS is regulated by the International Financial Services Commission (IFSC) of Belize and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), while EasyMarkets is regulated by CySEC, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and the Financial Services Authority (FSA) of St. Vincent and the Grenadines. For Zambia traders, neither broker is overseen by the local financial regulator, but both adhere to international standards, including client fund segregation and negative balance protection. EasyMarkets' ASIC regulation offers additional consumer safeguards, while FBS's IFSC license provides a more flexible trading environment. Always verify the specific entity serving Zambia clients for your chosen broker.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Zambia traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Zambia

Payment MethodFBSEasyMarkets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeElectronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days.Cards 1-2 business days; e-wallets instant-1 business day; bank wire 3-10 business days; overall back-office processing within 1 business day (24h)

Both FBS and EasyMarkets support the payment methods most relevant to Zambia traders: Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20. FBS offers more variety, including local bank transfers and additional e-wallets, with minimum deposits as low as $5 for standard accounts. EasyMarkets requires a $100 minimum deposit but processes withdrawals quickly, often within 24 hours. USDT TRC20 deposits are instant and fee-free on both platforms, making them ideal for crypto-savvy Zambians. Bank transfers may take 1-3 business days. FBS has no deposit fees, while EasyMarkets may charge a small fee for certain methods. Overall, FBS provides more flexibility for smaller budgets, while EasyMarkets offers faster withdrawal processing.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Zambia Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureFBSEasyMarkets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both FBS and EasyMarkets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Muslim traders in Zambia, complying with Sharia law by charging no swap or rollover interest on overnight positions. FBS provides Islamic accounts on request for all account types, including Standard, Cent, and ECN, with no additional fees. EasyMarkets offers a dedicated Islamic account with zero swap fees and no hidden charges, available for both standard and demo accounts. For Zambia traders, EasyMarkets' Islamic account is more straightforward as it is explicitly offered, while FBS requires a request. Both are reliable options for Muslim traders seeking halal trading.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS

FBS offers 24/7 multilingual customer support via live chat, email, and phone, with a dedicated team available in English, which is widely spoken in Zambia. EasyMarkets also provides 24/5 support via live chat, email, and phone, with English-speaking agents. FBS has a slight edge with 24/7 availability, which benefits Zambia traders in different time zones. Both have comprehensive FAQ sections, but FBS's support is more responsive for urgent issues.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureFBSEasyMarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsFBS
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsFBS
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)WeeklyMonthlyTie
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
FBS
★★★★★
9.2K
9,222 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
EasyMarkets
★★★★★
1.8K
1,830 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

FBS

Pros
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

EasyMarkets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Zambia Guide

Choose FBS if you...

  • Want low spreads and high leverage for active trading
  • Prefer advanced platforms like MetaTrader 4 or 5
  • Need flexible deposits with low minimums (from $5)
  • Value 24/7 customer support for different time zones

Choose EasyMarkets if you...

  • Are a beginner seeking a simple, user-friendly platform
  • Prefer fixed spreads for cost predictability
  • Want unique risk tools like dealCancellation and price freeze
  • Require fast withdrawal processing and strong regulatory oversight

FAQ - FBS vs EasyMarkets in Zambia

Is FBS or EasyMarkets better for Zambia? +
Can Zambia traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Zambia traders? +
How do Zambia traders deposit at FBS and EasyMarkets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Zambia? +

Final Verdict - Zambia 2026

FBS wins overall

For Zambia traders in 2025, FBS is the better choice for cost-conscious, active traders who need low spreads, high leverage, and flexible deposits via Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20. Its 24/7 support and advanced platforms suit experienced users. EasyMarkets is ideal for beginners or traders who value simplicity, fixed costs, and innovative risk management. While neither is locally regulated by the Zambian financial regulator, both are reputable. If you prioritize low trading costs and versatility, go with FBS. If you want a straightforward, low-risk experience, choose EasyMarkets.

Open FBSOpen EasyMarkets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Zambia traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
FBS Winner3.7/5
EasyMarkets 3.4/5
Similar Comparisons
Fbs Vs ExnessEasymarkets Vs ExnessFbs Vs Xm GroupEasymarkets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in Zambia
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.