HomeCompareFBS vs EasyMarketsSudan
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
Sudan
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

FBS vs EasyMarkets 2026: Complete Comparison for Sudan Traders

Which broker is better for Sudan traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS logo
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA · Founded 2009
Open Account
VS
EasyMarkets logo
EasyMarkets
CySEC · ASIC · FSA · Founded 2001
Open Account
Winner: FBS
Categories: 12 compared
For: Sudan traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Sudan Traders

Best Overall
FBS
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
EasyMarkets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for Sudan Muslims
Best for Beginners
FBS
Better education & support
$5 vs $25
Min deposit
1:3000 vs 1:2000
Max leverage
CySEC vs CySEC
Top regulator
3.7 vs 3.4
Our scores
Table of Contents

For Sudan traders looking to trade forex in 2025, choosing between FBS and EasyMarkets is a critical decision. Both brokers are popular among retail traders in Sudan due to their support for local payment methods like Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20, and they operate in USD, the preferred currency for trading in the country. FBS, with a score of 3.7/5, offers lower spreads and a wider range of account types, making it attractive for cost-conscious traders. EasyMarkets, scoring 3.4/5, provides fixed spreads and a user-friendly platform, ideal for beginners. This comparison covers trading costs, platforms, regulation, deposit methods, Islamic accounts, and support, all tailored to the unique needs of Sudan traders. Whether you prioritize low costs or simplicity, this guide helps you decide which broker aligns with your trading goals in Sudan's evolving forex market.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

FBS
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
EasyMarkets
EasyMarkets
CySEC · ASIC · FSA
3.4
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.8
WIN
3.5
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.4
WIN
3.1
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.2
3.7
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.8
WIN
3.5
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.5
WIN
3.2
Education
Webinars, guides
3.8
WIN
3.5
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.8
WIN
3.2
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.7
WIN
3.4
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentFBSEasyMarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotEasyMarkets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalEasyMarkets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsEasyMarkets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsEasyMarkets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$5$25EasyMarkets

When comparing trading costs for Sudan traders, FBS has a clear advantage with lower spreads. On the Standard account, EUR/USD spreads start from 0.7 pips, while EasyMarkets offers fixed spreads from 1.0 pip. For a Sudan trader executing 10 lots per month, this difference can save $30–$50 in spreads alone. FBS also offers a Cent account with micro-lots, allowing traders to test strategies with minimal capital. EasyMarkets includes commission-free trading but charges higher spreads, which can add up for active traders. Overall, FBS is more cost-effective for Sudan traders, especially those trading frequently or with larger volumes.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeFBSEasyMarkets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$5$25
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Sudan Traders

Entity / AssetFBSEasyMarkets
Sudan (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:2000
Forex major pairs1:30001:2000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Sudan Traders
Traders in Sudan typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS
Crypto CFDs30+20+FBS
Stocks / Share CFDsEasyMarkets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformFBSEasyMarkets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both brokers offer platforms that suit Sudan traders, but with key differences. FBS provides MetaTrader 4 and 5, which are industry-standard and support automated trading, custom indicators, and expert advisors. This is ideal for Sudan traders who want advanced tools. EasyMarkets offers its proprietary web-based platform and mobile app, which are simpler and easier to use, with features like deal cancellation and guaranteed stop-loss. For Sudan traders with limited internet bandwidth, EasyMarkets’ lightweight platform may be more reliable. However, FBS’s MetaTrader platforms offer more flexibility for those who want to trade multiple assets or use advanced strategies.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNEasyMarkets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

Execution quality varies between FBS and EasyMarkets, affecting Sudan traders’ trading experience. FBS offers ECN execution with low latency and no requotes, suitable for scalping and high-frequency trading. EasyMarkets uses market execution with fixed spreads, which provides price certainty but may have slightly slower execution during volatile periods. For Sudan traders with stable internet connections, FBS’s execution is faster and more reliable. EasyMarkets’ guaranteed stop-loss feature adds protection but may result in slippage during news events. Overall, FBS is better for active traders, while EasyMarkets suits those who prefer predictable execution.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Sudan Traders

Safety FactorFBSEasyMarkets
Primary regulatorIFSCCySEC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

Regulation is a key concern for Sudan traders, as the local financial regulator does not directly oversee international brokers. FBS is regulated by the IFSC (Belize) and CySEC, offering a level of client protection but not as strong as top-tier regulators. EasyMarkets is regulated by CySEC, ASIC, and the FSA (Seychelles), providing similar offshore oversight. For Sudan traders, this means both brokers operate legally but without the same protections as regulated brokers in major markets. Traders should verify each broker’s regulatory status and consider using segregated accounts for added safety. The local financial regulator in Sudan does not specifically endorse or restrict these brokers, so due diligence is essential.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Sudan traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Sudan

Payment MethodFBSEasyMarkets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeElectronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days.Cards 1-2 business days; e-wallets instant-1 business day; bank wire 3-10 business days; overall back-office processing within 1 business day (24h)

Depositing and withdrawing funds is straightforward for Sudan traders at both brokers, thanks to support for Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20. FBS also accepts local mobile money options like M-Pesa, which is popular in Sudan. Deposits via USDT TRC20 are processed instantly with minimal fees, making it the most efficient method. EasyMarkets supports the same payment methods but focuses on global e-wallets and bank transfers. Withdrawals at FBS are typically processed within 24 hours, while EasyMarkets may take 1-3 business days. Both brokers charge no deposit fees, but Sudan traders should check for any bank intermediary charges on bank transfers. For quick and low-cost transactions, USDT TRC20 is the best option for Sudan users.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Sudan Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureFBSEasyMarkets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Islamic (swap-free) accounts are available at both FBS and EasyMarkets, catering to Sudan’s Muslim-majority population. FBS offers Islamic accounts on all account types, including Cent, Standard, and ECN, with no swap fees on overnight positions. EasyMarkets also provides swap-free accounts but charges a small administrative fee after holding positions for a certain number of days (e.g., 10 days). For Sudan traders who trade long-term or hold positions overnight, FBS’s policy is more favorable. Both brokers require a declaration of Muslim faith to open an Islamic account. Sudan traders should confirm the specific terms, including any fees or restrictions, before opening an account.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS

Customer support is crucial for Sudan traders, especially when dealing with deposit issues or platform questions. FBS offers 24/7 live chat, email, and phone support in English and Arabic, which is beneficial for Sudan users. EasyMarkets also provides 24/5 support via live chat, email, and phone, with Arabic language options. FBS’s support is slightly more responsive, with average response times under 5 minutes. Both brokers have comprehensive FAQ sections on their websites. For Sudan traders, Arabic support is a key advantage, and both brokers deliver on this front.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureFBSEasyMarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsFBS
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsFBS
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)WeeklyMonthlyTie
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
FBS
★★★★★
9.2K
9,222 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
EasyMarkets
★★★★★
1.8K
1,830 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

FBS

Pros
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

EasyMarkets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Sudan Guide

Choose FBS if you...

  • Want lower spreads and lower trading costs for frequent trading
  • Prefer MetaTrader 4/5 for advanced trading tools and automation
  • Need Islamic accounts with no swap fees on all account types
  • Value fast execution for scalping or day trading strategies

Choose EasyMarkets if you...

  • Prefer fixed spreads and predictable trading costs
  • Are a beginner looking for a simple, user-friendly platform
  • Want features like deal cancellation and guaranteed stop-loss
  • Need reliable customer support in Arabic

FAQ - FBS vs EasyMarkets in Sudan

Is FBS or EasyMarkets better for Sudan? +
Can Sudan traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Sudan traders? +
How do Sudan traders deposit at FBS and EasyMarkets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Sudan? +

Final Verdict - Sudan 2026

FBS wins overall

For Sudan traders in 2025, FBS is the better overall choice due to its lower spreads, wider range of account types, and support for local payment methods like Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20. Its higher score (3.7/5 vs 3.4/5) reflects better cost efficiency and flexibility. However, EasyMarkets is a strong alternative for beginners who value simplicity and fixed costs. Both brokers are regulated offshore and accept Sudan clients, but FBS offers more value for active traders. Consider your trading style and budget when deciding. Ultimately, FBS’s lower costs and advanced platforms make it the recommended broker for most Sudan traders, while EasyMarkets suits those who prioritize ease of use.

Open FBSOpen EasyMarkets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Sudan traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
FBS Winner3.7/5
EasyMarkets 3.4/5
Similar Comparisons
Fbs Vs ExnessEasymarkets Vs ExnessFbs Vs Xm GroupEasymarkets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in Sudan
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.