HomeCompareFBS vs EasyMarketsHong Kong
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
Hong Kong
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

FBS vs EasyMarkets: Which Broker Suits Hong Kong Traders in 2026?

Which broker is better for Hong Kong traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS logo
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA · Founded 2009
Open Account
VS
EasyMarkets logo
EasyMarkets
CySEC · ASIC · FSA · Founded 2001
Open Account
Winner: FBS
Categories: 12 compared
For: Hong Kong traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Hong Kong Traders

Best Overall
FBS
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
EasyMarkets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for Hong Kong Muslims
Best for Beginners
FBS
Better education & support
$5 vs $25
Min deposit
1:3000 vs 1:2000
Max leverage
CySEC vs CySEC
Top regulator
3.7 vs 3.4
Our scores
Table of Contents

Hong Kong, as one of Asia's premier financial hubs, attracts sophisticated traders who demand low costs, robust platforms, and reliable execution. When comparing FBS vs EasyMarkets, Hong Kong traders must weigh each broker's offerings against local needs such as FPS deposits, HKD support, and access to global markets. FBS, with a rating of 3.7/5, is known for its ultra-low spreads and high leverage, appealing to active day traders in Hong Kong's fast-paced environment. EasyMarkets, rated 3.4/5, differentiates itself with fixed spreads and guaranteed stop-loss, catering to traders who prioritize risk control. Both brokers accept Hong Kong traders and support FPS, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card deposits, making them accessible. However, neither is regulated by the SFC, so due diligence is essential. This comparison will help you decide which broker aligns with your trading style and local requirements in 2025.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

FBS
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
EasyMarkets
EasyMarkets
CySEC · ASIC · FSA
3.4
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.8
WIN
3.5
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.4
WIN
3.1
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.2
3.7
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.8
WIN
3.5
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.5
WIN
3.2
Education
Webinars, guides
3.8
WIN
3.5
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.8
WIN
3.2
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.7
WIN
3.4
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentFBSEasyMarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotEasyMarkets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalEasyMarkets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsEasyMarkets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsEasyMarkets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$5$25EasyMarkets

For Hong Kong traders, trading costs are a decisive factor. FBS offers spreads from 0.7 pips on Standard accounts and from 0.1 pips on ECN accounts, making it highly competitive for high-frequency traders. EasyMarkets uses fixed spreads from 1 pip on major pairs, which eliminates uncertainty but is generally higher. A Hong Kong trader executing 100 lots per month on EUR/USD would pay approximately $700 in spreads with FBS (ECN) versus $1,000 with EasyMarkets. FBS also charges no commission on Standard accounts, while ECN accounts have a small commission. EasyMarkets has no hidden fees but includes the spread cost. For HKD-denominated pairs, FBS offers tighter spreads, benefiting local traders.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeFBSEasyMarkets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$5$25
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Hong Kong Traders

Entity / AssetFBSEasyMarkets
Hong Kong (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:2000
Forex major pairs1:30001:2000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Hong Kong Traders
Traders in Hong Kong typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS
Crypto CFDs30+20+FBS
Stocks / Share CFDsEasyMarkets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformFBSEasyMarkets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both brokers provide MT4 and MT5, the platforms of choice for Hong Kong traders who rely on advanced charting, automated trading, and fast execution. FBS also offers its proprietary FBS Trader app, which is mobile-optimized for on-the-go trading in Hong Kong's busy lifestyle. EasyMarkets provides its own web-based platform with dealCancellation and guaranteed stop-loss features, which are unique and valuable for risk management. Hong Kong traders who use Expert Advisors (EAs) will find FBS more compatible due to its support for MT4/MT5 EAs without restrictions. EasyMarkets also supports MT4 but limits certain EA functionalities on its proprietary platform. Both platforms are available in English and Chinese.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNEasyMarkets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

FBS uses No Dealing Desk (NDD) execution with ECN technology, offering average execution speeds of 0.3 seconds. EasyMarkets uses market execution with fixed spreads and guaranteed stop-loss, which can cause slight delays during high volatility. For Hong Kong traders trading major pairs like USD/HKD or EUR/USD, FBS provides faster execution and less slippage, especially during news events. EasyMarkets is better for traders who prioritize risk management over speed.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Hong Kong Traders

Safety FactorFBSEasyMarkets
Primary regulatorIFSCCySEC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

Regulation is a critical concern for Hong Kong traders accustomed to SFC oversight. FBS is regulated by the IFSC (Belize) and CySEC (Cyprus), while EasyMarkets is regulated by CySEC, ASIC (Australia), and the FSCA (South Africa). Neither broker holds an SFC license in Hong Kong, meaning they are not subject to local investor compensation schemes. However, both adhere to international standards, with EasyMarkets offering negative balance protection and FBS providing segregated client accounts. Hong Kong traders should assess the regulatory tier: CySEC offers EU-level protection, while IFSC is less stringent. For high-net-worth traders, the lack of SFC regulation may be a drawback, but both brokers have a long operational history.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Hong Kong traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Hong Kong

Payment MethodFBSEasyMarkets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeElectronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days.Cards 1-2 business days; e-wallets instant-1 business day; bank wire 3-10 business days; overall back-office processing within 1 business day (24h)

Hong Kong traders benefit from multiple deposit methods at both brokers. FBS supports FPS (Faster Payment System) deposits in HKD, which are instant and free, with a minimum of $10 USD equivalent. Bank transfers are accepted but may take 1-2 business days, while credit cards (Visa, Mastercard) are processed immediately. EasyMarkets also supports FPS, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card, with a minimum deposit of $100 USD. Withdrawals at FBS are processed within 2-3 hours for e-wallets and 1-2 days for bank transfers, with no fees. EasyMarkets processes withdrawals within 1 business day for bank transfers and instantly for credit cards, with no fees for the first withdrawal per month. Both brokers support HKD accounts, reducing conversion costs for local traders. FPS is the most efficient method for Hong Kong traders due to its speed and zero fees.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Hong Kong Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureFBSEasyMarkets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

For Hong Kong Muslim traders, both FBS and EasyMarkets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts. FBS provides Islamic accounts on request, with no swap charges on overnight positions, and they are available on Standard and ECN accounts. EasyMarkets automatically applies swap-free conditions for clients in Muslim-majority regions, including Hong Kong, without requiring a separate account type. Both brokers comply with Sharia law by not charging or paying interest. However, FBS may have a holding period limit (usually 30 days) after which a swap fee applies, while EasyMarkets offers indefinite swap-free trading. Hong Kong traders should confirm terms before opening an Islamic account.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS

FBS offers 24/7 customer support via live chat, email, and phone, with support available in English, Chinese, and other languages. EasyMarkets provides 24/5 live chat and email support, with phone support during business hours. For Hong Kong traders, FBS's 24/7 availability is an advantage given the time zone and active trading hours. Both brokers have responsive teams, but FBS's round-the-clock support is more aligned with Hong Kong's 24-hour market access.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureFBSEasyMarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsFBS
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsFBS
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceFBSEasyMarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)WeeklyMonthlyTie
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
FBS
★★★★★
9.2K
9,222 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
EasyMarkets
★★★★★
1.8K
1,830 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

FBS

Pros
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

EasyMarkets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Hong Kong Guide

Choose FBS if you...

  • Are a high-frequency scalper seeking ultra-low spreads from 0.1 pips.
  • Prefer using Expert Advisors (EAs) on MT4/MT5 without restrictions.
  • Want 24/7 customer support and instant FPS deposits in HKD.
  • Need high leverage up to 1:3000 for maximizing small capital.

Choose EasyMarkets if you...

  • Value guaranteed stop-loss and fixed spreads for predictable costs.
  • Prefer a broker with multiple top-tier regulations (CySEC, ASIC).
  • Want a swap-free Islamic account with no time limits.
  • Need dealCancellation feature to reverse losing trades within 24 hours.

FAQ - FBS vs EasyMarkets in Hong Kong

Is FBS or EasyMarkets better for Hong Kong? +
Can Hong Kong traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Hong Kong traders? +
How do Hong Kong traders deposit at FBS and EasyMarkets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Hong Kong? +

Final Verdict - Hong Kong 2026

FBS wins overall

For Hong Kong traders in 2025, FBS is the better choice for active, cost-sensitive traders due to its lower spreads, faster execution, and support for FPS deposits. Its higher rating (3.7 vs 3.4) reflects these advantages. EasyMarkets appeals to risk-averse traders who prioritize guaranteed stop-loss and fixed spreads, as well as those who value regulatory oversight from ASIC and CySEC. While neither broker is SFC-regulated, both have proven track records. Ultimately, FBS suits traders seeking low costs and high leverage, while EasyMarkets is ideal for those who want risk management tools. Consider your trading style and use FPS for fastest deposits.

Open FBSOpen EasyMarkets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Hong Kong traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
FBS Winner3.7/5
EasyMarkets 3.4/5
Similar Comparisons
Fbs Vs ExnessEasymarkets Vs ExnessFbs Vs Xm GroupEasymarkets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in Hong Kong
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.