Which broker is better for China traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
For China traders seeking offshore forex exposure in 2025, choosing between Exness and FxOpen is a key decision. Exness, rated 4.8/5 by CompareBroker, is a global leader with over 700,000 active clients and a strong reputation for low-cost trading. FxOpen, scoring 3.7/5, is a niche broker popular among scalpers and algorithmic traders. Both brokers accept Chinese clients through international entities (Exness SC Ltd, FxOpen Ltd) and support USDT deposits via TRC-20 and SWIFT bank transfers. However, the CSRC does not regulate either, so traders must operate offshore. Exness offers tighter spreads on USD/CNH and gold, while FxOpen provides ECN pricing for high-volume trading. This comparison covers spreads, platforms, deposits, and regulation specific to China traders, helping you choose the best broker for your offshore strategy.
| Instrument | Exness | FxOpen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | FxOpen |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | FxOpen |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | FxOpen |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | FxOpen |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $100 | $100 | Tie |
For China traders, trading costs are critical due to capital controls and volume sensitivity. Exness offers spreads from 0.1 pips on EUR/USD (Standard Cent account) and 0.0 pips on Raw Spread accounts with a $3.5 commission per lot. FxOpen’s ECN account starts at 0.2 pips with a $3.0 commission. On USD/CNH, Exness spreads average 1.5 pips vs FxOpen’s 2.0 pips. For gold (XAU/USD), Exness is 0.3 pips vs 0.5 pips. A China trader trading 10 lots per month on EUR/USD would pay $35 in commissions at Exness (Raw Spread) vs $30 at FxOpen (ECN), but Exness’s tighter spreads save $20 on USD/CNH. Overall, Exness is more cost-effective for forex pairs popular with China traders.
| Account Type | Exness | FxOpen |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero spread account | ✓ | ✓ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Entity / Asset | Exness | FxOpen |
|---|---|---|
| China (offshore) | Up to 1:2000 | Up to 1:500 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:2000 | 1:500 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | Exness | FxOpen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | Exness |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | Exness |
| Crypto CFDs | 30+ | ✗ | Exness |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | 1,700+ | FxOpen |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | Exness | FxOpen |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✓ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✓ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✓ |
| TradingView | ✗ | ✓ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Both brokers offer MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, which are standard for China traders. Exness also provides WebTerminal and mobile apps with Chinese language support and one-click trading. FxOpen offers cTrader in addition to MT4/5, which is popular among scalpers for its depth of market. For China traders, Exness’s platform is more user-friendly with local payment integration and faster execution. FxOpen’s cTrader is better for algorithmic traders using ECN pricing. Both support VPS hosting for low-latency trading, but Exness offers free VPS for active traders (over 5 lots/month).
| Factor | Exness | FxOpen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | FxOpen |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | Exness |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
Exness boasts 99.9% execution within 0.1 seconds on average, with no requotes on Standard accounts. FxOpen offers ECN execution with 0.2-second average speed and no dealing desk intervention. Exness’s execution is more reliable for volatile pairs like USD/CNH, while FxOpen’s ECN model suits scalpers. Both have 99.9% uptime, but Exness’s infrastructure in London and New York provides lower latency for China traders using VPS.
| Safety Factor | Exness | FxOpen |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | FCA | FCA |
| Top-tier regulated | ✓ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Exness is regulated by the FCA (UK), CySEC (Cyprus), and FSA (Seychelles), offering strong client fund segregation and negative balance protection. FxOpen is regulated by the FCA (UK) and CySEC, with similar protections. For China traders, neither broker is CSRC-regulated, meaning no local dispute resolution. Exness’s FCA regulation provides higher trust due to strict capital requirements. FxOpen’s FCA status is also solid but its lower overall score (3.7/5) reflects past customer service issues. China traders should verify the entity they register with—Exness SC Ltd (Seychelles) is common for Asian clients, while FxOpen Ltd (CySEC) serves offshore traders.
| Payment Method | Exness | FxOpen |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neteller | ✓ | ✓ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✓ | ✓ |
| Withdrawal time | crypto takes 30–60 minutes, and bank cards or wires take 1 to 5 business days | 24 hours |
China traders can fund accounts at both brokers using USDT (TRC-20/ERC-20) and international bank transfers (SWIFT). Exness supports USDT deposits with no fees and instant processing, minimum $10. Bank transfers are free but take 1-3 days, minimum $100. Withdrawals to USDT are processed within 24 hours, with no fees. FxOpen accepts USDT via TRC-20 with a $50 minimum and 0.5% network fee. Bank transfers take 2-5 days and may incur intermediary fees ($10-20). Exness’s lower minimums and faster processing make it more convenient for China traders. Both brokers require KYC verification, which can be done with Chinese passport or ID. Avoid using local Chinese banks for direct transfers due to capital controls; USDT is the preferred method.
| Islamic Account Feature | Exness | FxOpen |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
Both Exness and FxOpen offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Muslim traders in China. Exness provides swap-free accounts on Standard and Standard Cent accounts with no additional fees or time limits. FxOpen offers Islamic accounts on ECN and STP accounts but charges a small administration fee (e.g., $5 per lot after 30 days). Exness’s policy is more favorable for long-term holding, while FxOpen’s is better for short-term scalping. Both require a declaration of faith for eligibility. For China Muslim traders, Exness is the preferred choice due to no hidden costs.
| Support Feature | Exness | FxOpen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✓ | ✗ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✓ | ✗ | Exness |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | Exness |
Exness offers 24/7 multilingual support in Chinese via live chat, email, and phone. Response times are under 2 minutes on chat. FxOpen provides 24/5 support in Chinese, with slower response times (5-10 minutes on chat). Exness also has a dedicated Chinese account manager for high-volume traders. FxOpen’s support is adequate but less responsive during Asian hours. For China traders, Exness’s round-the-clock support is a key advantage.
| Mobile Feature | Exness | FxOpen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | Exness |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | Exness |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✗ | ✓ | FxOpen |
| Resource | Exness | FxOpen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | Exness |
Choose Exness if you...
Choose FxOpen if you...
For China traders in 2025, Exness is the clear winner with a 4.8/5 score vs FxOpen’s 3.7/5. Exness offers tighter spreads on popular pairs, instant USDT deposits via TRC-20, and 24/7 Chinese support—key factors for offshore trading. FxOpen is a niche choice for scalpers using cTrader, but its higher minimums and slower support make it less suitable for most China traders. Both brokers operate outside CSRC regulation, so use USDT for deposits and avoid local banks. For long-term growth, Exness’s reliability and low costs outweigh FxOpen’s ECN pricing. Choose Exness for a seamless offshore trading experience.