Which broker is better for China traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
For China traders looking to diversify into international forex markets, Oanda and Plus500 are two prominent offshore brokers, each with distinct strengths. Oanda, founded in 1996, is known for its robust analytical tools and flexible position sizing, while Plus500, established in 2008, excels with a user-friendly platform and competitive spreads. Both brokers are popular among Chinese traders who operate outside the CSRC's domestic regulatory framework, relying on licenses from the FCA, ASIC, and CySEC. The key considerations for China traders include deposit methods like USDT and Bank Transfer (international), which both brokers support, as well as the ability to trade major pairs, indices, and commodities. With Plus500 scoring 3.7/5 versus Oanda's 3.6/5, the difference is marginal, but your choice hinges on whether you prioritize advanced charting (Oanda) or lower trading costs (Plus500). This comparison delves into spreads, platforms, regulation, and local payment options to help you decide.
| Instrument | Oanda | Plus500 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | Plus500 |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | Plus500 |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | Plus500 |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | Plus500 |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $0 | $100 | Oanda |
For China traders, trading costs are a critical factor, especially when trading high volumes. Plus500 typically offers tighter spreads on major forex pairs like EUR/USD, starting at 0.6 pips, compared to Oanda's variable spreads averaging 0.8-1.2 pips. However, Oanda charges no commission on forex trades, while Plus500's spreads include all costs. For a China trader executing 10 standard lots per month, Plus500 could save up to $200 in spread costs. Oanda's pricing is more transparent with no hidden fees, but its spreads widen during volatile Asian sessions. Consider your trading frequency and pair preferences to gauge which broker offers better value.
| Account Type | Oanda | Plus500 |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $0 | $100 |
| Entity / Asset | Oanda | Plus500 |
|---|---|---|
| China (offshore) | Up to 1:100 | Up to 1:300 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:100 | 1:300 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | Oanda | Plus500 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | Oanda |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | Oanda |
| Crypto CFDs | ✗ | 20+ | Oanda |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | 1,700+ | Plus500 |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
| Platform | Oanda | Plus500 |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✓ | ✗ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✗ | ✗ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✗ |
| TradingView | ✓ | ✗ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✗ |
Oanda provides the advanced fxTrade platform and MetaTrader 4 (MT4), which is widely used by Chinese traders for its custom indicators and automated trading. Plus500 offers its proprietary web-based platform, which is intuitive and mobile-friendly but lacks MT4 support. For China traders who rely on technical analysis and EA bots, Oanda's MT4 integration is a major advantage. Plus500's platform is ideal for beginners or those who prefer a streamlined experience with one-click trading. Both platforms are available in English and Chinese, but Oanda's tools offer deeper market analysis.
| Factor | Oanda | Plus500 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | Plus500 |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | Oanda |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✗ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
Oanda uses a no-dealing-desk (NDD) model with straight-through processing, ensuring fast execution with minimal requotes. Plus500 operates as a market maker, which can lead to slight slippage during volatile periods but generally offers reliable execution. For China traders trading during Asian sessions, Oanda's execution is more consistent, especially for large orders. Plus500's execution is fine for retail traders but may not suit scalpers. Test both with a demo account to assess latency and fill rates.
| Safety Factor | Oanda | Plus500 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | FCA | FCA |
| Top-tier regulated | ✓ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Both Oanda and Plus500 are regulated by top-tier authorities like the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), and CySEC (Cyprus), providing a layer of security for China traders. However, neither is regulated by the CSRC, meaning deposits are not protected under China's domestic investor compensation schemes. For China traders, this means you must rely on the broker's international reputation and segregated client funds. Oanda has a longer track record (since 1996) and is listed on public exchanges, while Plus500 is a FTSE 250 company. Always verify the specific entity you trade with, as terms may vary by jurisdiction.
| Payment Method | Oanda | Plus500 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✗ | ✗ |
| Neteller | ✗ | ✗ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✗ | ✓ |
| Withdrawal time | 1 to 5 business days | 1 to 3 business day |
China traders can fund both Oanda and Plus500 using USDT (Tether) and Bank Transfer (international), which are the most popular methods for offshore trading. USDT deposits are processed instantly with no fees, making them ideal for small to medium amounts. Bank Transfer (international) works for larger sums but incurs wire fees (typically $10-30) and takes 1-3 business days. Oanda has no minimum deposit, while Plus500 requires $50. Withdrawals are processed within 1-2 business days for both brokers, with USDT withdrawals being the fastest. Oanda also supports credit/debit cards and PayPal, though these may have lower limits for China traders. Always check for any currency conversion fees if depositing in CNY.
| Islamic Account Feature | Oanda | Plus500 |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✗ | ✗ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
For Muslim traders in China, both Oanda and Plus500 offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts that comply with Sharia law. Oanda provides Islamic accounts upon request after account verification, with no swap charges on overnight positions. Plus500 automatically applies swap-free status to accounts from eligible countries, including China, but may charge an administrative fee after a holding period (e.g., 10 days). Oanda's policy is more straightforward with no hidden fees, but Plus500's automatic application is convenient. Both accounts are available for forex trading, but check if they cover CFDs on indices and commodities.
| Support Feature | Oanda | Plus500 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✓ | ✗ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | Oanda |
Oanda offers 24/5 customer support via live chat, email, and phone, with English as the primary language. Plus500 provides 24/7 live chat and email support, also in English, but phone support is limited. For China traders, neither broker offers dedicated Mandarin support, which can be a drawback. However, Plus500's live chat is faster and available around the clock, while Oanda's email response times are slower. Both brokers have extensive FAQ sections and educational resources in English, but Chinese-language materials are scarce.
| Mobile Feature | Oanda | Plus500 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | Oanda |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | Oanda |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✓ | ✗ | Oanda |
| Resource | Oanda | Plus500 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | ✗ | Oanda |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | ✗ | Oanda |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✗ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | Oanda |
Choose Oanda if you...
Choose Plus500 if you...
For China traders seeking offshore forex exposure, both Oanda and Plus500 are solid choices, but the best fit depends on your priorities. Plus500's tighter spreads and user-friendly platform make it ideal for cost-conscious traders and beginners, while Oanda's advanced tools and MT4 support cater to technical traders. The availability of USDT and Bank Transfer (international) deposits ensures easy funding for Chinese clients. However, remember that neither broker is regulated by the CSRC, so due diligence is essential. If you trade high volume and value low costs, choose Plus500; if you need sophisticated analysis and flexible trading, go with Oanda. Both are reputable, but your trading style will ultimately decide the winner.