Which broker is better for Australia traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
For Australian traders who value ASIC regulation and advanced trading tools, choosing between IG and Oanda can be challenging. Both brokers are well-established and hold Australian Financial Services Licences, ensuring compliance with local laws and client fund protection. IG, rated 4.2/5, is known for its comprehensive platform (ProRealTime, MetaTrader 4, and proprietary L2 Dealer), deep market access (17,000+ instruments), and competitive spreads. Oanda, rated 3.6/5, offers a more straightforward approach with its own platform and strong focus on forex and CFDs, supported by robust research tools. In the Australian context, factors such as local deposit methods (BPAY, POLi, Bank Transfer, Credit Card), AUD account opening, and support availability during Sydney trading hours matter. This comparison breaks down costs, platforms, and regulatory protections to help you determine which broker fits your experience level and trading style in 2025.
| Instrument | IG | Oanda | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | Oanda |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | Oanda |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | Oanda |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | Oanda |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $0 | $0 | Tie |
For Australian traders, trading costs hinge on spreads, commissions, and overnight swap rates. IG typically offers lower spreads on major forex pairs like AUD/USD and EUR/USD, with raw spreads from 0.6 pips on its Active account (requires 500k USD volume/month). Oanda’s spreads are variable and average 0.9-1.2 pips for EUR/USD, though they can tighten during high liquidity. Oanda does not charge commissions on standard accounts, while IG adds a commission on its direct market access (DMA) accounts. For Australian traders trading high volumes, IG’s volume-based discounts can significantly reduce costs. Both brokers offer swap fees on overnight positions; IG’s rates are competitive. Always compare the all-in cost including any withdrawal or inactivity fees. For AUD pairs, IG often edges out Oanda on cost efficiency.
| Account Type | IG | Oanda |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Entity / Asset | IG | Oanda |
|---|---|---|
| Australia (offshore) | Up to 1:30 | Up to 1:100 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:30 | 1:100 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | IG | Oanda | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | IG |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | IG |
| Crypto CFDs | 30+ | ✗ | IG |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | 1,000+ | ✗ | Oanda |
| ETFs | ✓ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | IG | Oanda |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✓ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✓ | ✗ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✗ |
| TradingView | ✓ | ✓ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Australian traders have distinct platform needs: reliability, local charting, and mobile access. IG provides three main platforms: its proprietary web platform, MetaTrader 4 (MT4), and ProRealTime. ProRealTime offers advanced charting, automated trading, and custom indicators. Oanda’s flagship platform is its web-based Trading Platform, known for clean design and strong charting tools. Oanda also offers MT4 and a mobile app. For Australian traders, IG’s ProRealTime is a standout for technical analysis. Oanda’s platform is easier for beginners but limited in automated trading. Both support real-time news and economic calendars. If you need algorithmic trading or complex analysis, IG wins. For a minimalist, user-friendly interface with good research, Oanda is suitable.
| Factor | IG | Oanda | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | Oanda |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | IG |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✓ | ✗ | Tie |
Execution quality matters for Australian traders dealing with volatile markets. IG uses Straight Through Processing (STP) with a market maker hybrid model, offering fast execution with no requotes on most orders. Oanda is primarily a market maker, executing instantly with no dealing desk intervention for most trades. Both brokers offer negative balance protection. IG’s execution is generally more reliable during news events, though slippage can occur. Oanda’s execution is consistent. For scalpers or algorithmic traders, IG’s low latency and DMA option are superior.
| Safety Factor | IG | Oanda |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | FCA | FCA |
| Top-tier regulated | ✓ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Both IG and Oanda are regulated by ASIC in Australia, which is a critical factor for experienced traders. IG holds AFSL 220440, while Oanda operates under AFSL 412981. ASIC regulation means client funds must be segregated in trust accounts, brokers cannot engage in misleading conduct, and they must report to ASIC. Additionally, IG is regulated by the FCA in the UK and other top-tier bodies, adding an extra layer of oversight. Oanda is also regulated in the US, UK, and Singapore. For Australian traders, the primary protection is ASIC’s stringent rules, which include negative balance protection and a dispute resolution scheme (FOS or AFCA). Both brokers offer transparent execution and compliance with Australian financial laws.
| Payment Method | IG | Oanda |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✗ | ✗ |
| Neteller | ✗ | ✗ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✓ | ✗ |
| Withdrawal time | 1 to 5 business days | 1 to 5 business days |
Australian traders can fund accounts using AUD through several local methods. Both IG and Oanda accept Bank Transfer (direct debit), Credit Card (Visa/Mastercard), BPAY (for IG—Oanda does not support BPAY), and POLi (instant online banking). IG supports BPAY, which is convenient for direct payments without sharing bank details. Oanda accepts POLi for instant funding. Minimum deposits: IG requires $250 AUD for account opening; Oanda has no minimum for bank transfer but $1 AUD for other methods. Withdrawals are free at both brokers when using bank transfer (IG may charge $10 for international transfers). Credit card withdrawals are not available at Oanda. Both process withdrawals within 1-3 business days. Overall, IG offers more variety with BPAY, while Oanda’s POLi option is seamless for Australian bank users.
| Islamic Account Feature | IG | Oanda |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✓ | ✗ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
For Australian Muslim traders seeking swap-free accounts compliant with Sharia law, only IG offers an Islamic account (swap-free). IG waives overnight interest charges on positions held past market close, provided you declare your faith. Approval is subject to review, and the account may still incur commissions or spreads. Oanda does not offer Islamic accounts for Australian residents—all accounts incur swap fees. Therefore, Muslim traders in Australia should choose IG for an ethical trading experience. Note that swap-free accounts sometimes have limited trading conditions, so review IG’s terms carefully.
| Support Feature | IG | Oanda | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | IG |
Both brokers offer dedicated Australian customer support via phone, live chat, and email. IG’s support is available 24/5, with Australian hours covered by a Melbourne-based team. Oanda also provides 24/5 phone support and live chat. IG’s support is more responsive, especially for technical issues, and offers a comprehensive Help Centre. Oanda’s support is friendly but slightly slower during non-Sydney hours. For local traders, IG’s local presence gives an edge.
| Mobile Feature | IG | Oanda | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | IG |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | IG |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Resource | IG | Oanda | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | Monthly | Tie |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | IG |
Choose IG if you...
Choose Oanda if you...
For experienced Australian traders seeking ASIC-regulated brokers, IG is the stronger choice overall with a higher rating (4.2/5) and broader capabilities. Its lower spreads, extensive market access, advanced platforms, and local deposit options including BPAY and POLi make it ideal for active traders. Oanda (3.6/5) remains a solid option for forex traders who value ease of use and no minimum deposit, but it lacks Islamic accounts and BPAY. Both are SAFE under ASIC. If you prioritise comprehensive tools and local convenience (BPAY, POLi, Credit Card), IG leads. For a minimalist, cost-effective start, Oanda works. Visit comparebroker.io for personalised recommendations.