HomeCompareIC Markets vs RoboForexJapan
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
August 2026
🌍
Country
Japan
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

IC Markets vs RoboForex for Japan Traders (2026)

Which broker is better for Japan traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
VS
RO
RoboForex
0 · Founded 2026
Open Account
Winner: RoboForex
Categories: 12 compared
For: Japan traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Japan Traders

Best Overall
RoboForex
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
RoboForex
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for Japan Muslims
Best for Beginners
RoboForex
Better education & support
$200 vs $10
Min deposit
1:5000 vs 1:2000
Max leverage
ASIC vs 0
Top regulator
3.6 vs 3.9
Our scores
Table of Contents

Japanese traders operating inside the FSA Japan framework face a unique challenge: domestic brokers offer strict regulation but often limited leverage and a narrower product set. As a result, sophisticated Japanese retail traders increasingly evaluate offshore ECN/STP brokers for deeper liquidity and tighter pricing. IC Markets and RoboForex are two names that frequently appear in this debate, but they are far from equal. IC Markets, rated 4.8/5, is a pure agency-model broker with raw spreads, low-latency execution, and a strong global reputation. RoboForex, rated 3.2/5, offers more account flexibility and a wider instrument range, but operates under a thinner offshore framework. For Japan's regulated, sophisticated traders who care about spread integrity, execution speed and platform reliability, IC Markets is generally the benchmark. This comparison looks specifically at how each broker serves Japan traders using JPY account funding, local payment methods like Bank Transfer and Credit Card, and whether their regulatory models align with expectations of an FSA Japan-aware trader.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
VS
RO
RoboForex
0
3.9
CompareBroker score
Winner
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.7
4.0
WIN
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.8
WIN
3.6
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.9
4.2
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.7
4.0
WIN
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.4
3.7
WIN
Education
Webinars, guides
3.3
4.0
WIN
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.7
4.0
WIN
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.6
3.9
WIN
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentIC MarketsRoboForexWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotRoboForex
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalRoboForex
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsRoboForex
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsRoboForex
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$200$10RoboForex

For Japan traders, the cost of trading USDJPY is the most direct measure of competitiveness. IC Markets uses a true ECN model with raw spreads from 0.0 pips and a USD 6 round-turn commission per lot. In practice, USDJPY spreads on IC Markets sit between 0.1 and 0.3 pips during the Tokyo session, giving high-volume traders a material edge. RoboForex's Standard account starts at 1.2 pips with no commission, while its Raw Spread account can also go to 0.0 pips but charges a higher commission. Once commission and spread are blended, IC Markets is often 30% to 50% cheaper per round lot across JPY crosses. For Japanese scalpers who turn dozens of lots per day, the difference in monthly trading costs is significant.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeIC MarketsRoboForex
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$200$10
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Japan Traders

Entity / AssetIC MarketsRoboForex
Japan (offshore)Up to 1:5000Up to 1:2000
Forex major pairs1:50001:2000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Japan Traders
Traders in Japan typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassIC MarketsRoboForexWinner
Forex pairs90+65+IC Markets
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesIC Markets
Crypto CFDs30+20+IC Markets
Stocks / Share CFDsRoboForex
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformIC MarketsRoboForex
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

MetaTrader 4 remains the default platform for Japanese traders, and both IC Markets and RoboForex support MT4 and MT5. IC Markets adds cTrader and TradingView integration, which gives Japan traders access to level-2 market depth and superior charting tools. RoboForex offers its proprietary R StocksTrader platform for multi-asset trading, but it lacks cTrader. Japanese algorithmic traders will also appreciate IC Markets' reliable FIX API and deep market data. For those focusing on price action and low-latency execution, the combination of MT4 and cTrader at IC Markets is more aligned with professional needs.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorIC MarketsRoboForexWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNRoboForex
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msIC Markets
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

IC Markets executes orders through a pure ECN model, aggregating liquidity from top-tier banks with an average execution speed of around 40 milliseconds. There is no dealing desk intervention, so Japan traders rarely face requotes during active Tokyo hours. RoboForex uses NDD/STP execution, but its liquidity depth is thinner and some traders report occasional re-quotes during BoJ news events. For Japanese scalpers and algorithm-driven traders, IC Markets offers better price stability and more consistent order fills, particularly when trading USDJPY during high-impact releases.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Japan Traders

Safety FactorIC MarketsRoboForex
Primary regulatorASICIFSC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

IC Markets is regulated by ASIC in Australia and by CySEC in Europe, with a strict client money segregation regime and negative balance protection. RoboForex holds an offshore license from the Financial Services Commission of Belize, which provides far weaker investor protection. Neither broker is licensed by the FSA Japan, so Japanese residents are not covered by the FSA's domestic compensation funds. Japan's FSA regularly warns about unregulated offshore forex brokers, making it important to choose an entity with stronger oversight. From a risk standpoint, IC Markets offers Japanese traders a notably safer global corporate structure.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Japan traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Japan

Payment MethodIC MarketsRoboForex
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeE-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days1 to 5 business days

Japanese traders can fund both IC Markets and RoboForex using Bank Transfer or Credit Card, which are the two local payment methods most commonly used in Japan. Bank Transfer is accepted via international wire at both brokers; deposits usually take one to two business days and may be subject to intermediary bank fees. Credit card deposits with Visa and Mastercard are instant and free at IC Markets, while RoboForex also supports them but with occasional internal processing delays. Withdrawals at IC Markets are typically returned to the original funding method, creating a clean audit trail for Japan traders who value compliance. RoboForex offers more payment options, including e-wallets, but some withdrawal methods carry fixed fees. Japanese traders should also convert to a JPY-denominated account if available, as USD-based accounts may reduce actual withdrawal amounts.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Japan Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureIC MarketsRoboForex
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both IC Markets and RoboForex provide Islamic swap-free accounts for Japan's Muslim traders, reflecting the global demand for sharia-compliant trading. IC Markets offers swap-free terms on its Raw and Standard accounts, meaning no overnight interest is charged on FX positions. RoboForex also provides swap-free conditions on most of its account types, including its multi-asset R StocksTrader account. However, Japanese traders must read the swap-free policy closely: both brokers may widen spreads or implement a fee after the holding period exceeds a defined number of days. For long-term position traders in Japan, the account with the most transparent Islamic policy should be selected.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureIC MarketsRoboForexWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesIC Markets

IC Markets provides 24/7 customer support via live chat and email, with strong response times and technical knowledge. Japanese traders can access support in English around the clock, and although dedicated Japanese phone lines are limited, the live chat service is generally fast and reliable. RoboForex also offers 24/7 support through live chat, email and callback options, but Japanese-language availability is less consistent. For sophisticated Japan traders who need quick resolution around server issues and platform configurations, IC Markets has the more dependable support record.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureIC MarketsRoboForexWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsIC Markets
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsIC Markets
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceIC MarketsRoboForexWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)MonthlyTie
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicIC Markets

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
IC Markets
★★★★★
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
RoboForex
★★★★★
3.2K
3,200 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support

RoboForex

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Japan Guide

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Are a Japanese scalper or algo trader needing raw institutional spreads on USDJPY.
  • Want to trade on MT4, MT5 or cTrader with superior charting and API access.
  • Prefer a broker with ASIC or CySEC oversight rather than offshore-only regulation.
  • Demand fast execution and consistent fills during news-heavy Japanese sessions.

Choose RoboForex if you...

  • Want access to a wider multi-asset platform like R StocksTrader along with forex.
  • Appreciate bonus promotions and more flexible account types.
  • Need larger variety of local and e-wallet payment methods for withdrawals.
  • Are comfortable with an offshore Belize license in exchange for wider product choice.

FAQ - IC Markets vs RoboForex in Japan

Is IC Markets or RoboForex better for Japan? +
Can Japan traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Japan traders? +
How do Japan traders deposit at IC Markets and RoboForex? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Japan? +

Final Verdict - Japan 2026

RoboForex wins overall

For Japan's regulated sophisticated traders, IC Markets is the clear winner in this comparison, carrying a 4.8/5 score against RoboForex's 3.2/5. The difference is driven by tighter USDJPY spreads, stronger regulatory frameworks, and superior execution quality. Both brokers support Bank Transfer and Credit Card deposits from Japan, and both offer Islamic accounts, but IC Markets better aligns with the cost discipline and execution standards expected by Japanese professionals. RoboForex may appeal to traders looking for stock exposure via R StocksTrader or a wider range of payment options, but its offshore-only regulation and higher all-in costs are difficult to justify. When evaluated against FSA Japan expectations and local deposit preferences, IC Markets is the safer and more professional choice.

Open IC MarketsOpen RoboForex
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Japan traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
IC Markets 3.6/5
RoboForex Winner3.9/5
Similar Comparisons
Ic Markets Vs ExnessRoboforex Vs ExnessIc Markets Vs Xm GroupRoboforex Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in Japan
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.