HomeCompareIC Markets vs Moneta MarketsUnited States
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
August 2026
🌍
Country
United States
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

IC Markets vs Moneta Markets Comparison for United States Traders (2026)

Which broker is better for United States traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
VS
MO
Moneta Markets
ASIC · FSCA · FSA · Founded 2019
Open Account
Winner: IC Markets
Categories: 12 compared
For: United States traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — United States Traders

Best Overall
IC Markets
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
Moneta Markets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for United States Muslims
Best for Beginners
IC Markets
Better education & support
$200 vs $50
Min deposit
1:5000 vs 1:1000
Max leverage
ASIC vs ASIC
Top regulator
3.6 vs 3.3
Our scores
Table of Contents

United States traders operate in one of the most tightly regulated forex environments in the world. The NFA (National Futures Association) and CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) require all retail forex brokers serving US residents to maintain strict registration, capital, and reporting standards. IC Markets and Moneta Markets are two well-known global brokers, but neither holds NFA/CFTC registration. This instantly disqualifies them from accepting US-based accounts. In practice, US traders will find it impossible to open an account with either broker without submitting false residential or citizenship information, which is both illegal and high-risk. Even though IC Markets carries a strong reputation for low spreads and high-frequency execution, and Moneta Markets is known for its competitive fee structure and educational resources, these strengths do not overcome the regulatory barrier for US traders. This comparison serves two purposes: first, it explains the key differences between IC Markets and Moneta Markets so that traders in other jurisdictions can choose between them; second, it clearly outlines why US traders must instead focus on NFA/CFTC-compliant alternative brokers that support American clients with Bank Wire, ACH, and Credit Card funding methods. Understanding the local regulatory context is essential before evaluating any broker, especially in the United States where offshore access is strictly prohibited.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
MO
Moneta Markets
ASIC · FSCA · FSA
3.3
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.7
WIN
3.4
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.8
WIN
3.0
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.9
WIN
3.6
Deposits
Local payments
3.7
WIN
3.3
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.4
WIN
3.1
Education
Webinars, guides
3.3
WIN
3.0
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.7
WIN
3.4
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.6
WIN
3.3
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentIC MarketsMoneta MarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotMoneta Markets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalMoneta Markets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsMoneta Markets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsMoneta Markets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$200$50IC Markets

IC Markets is known for raw interbank spreads starting at 0.0 pips on its True ECN accounts, with a commission of $6 per standard round lot. This pricing structure appeals to high-volume scalpers who trade frequently and need the tightest possible spreads. Moneta Markets uses a more traditional commission-free model, with spreads starting around 0.5 pips on its Pro account and 1.0–1.2 pips on the Standard account. For traders outside the US, IC Markets usually offers lower all-in costs when volumes exceed several lots per day, because the commission is offset by tighter spreads. However, for United States traders, these comparisons are purely academic. Since neither broker is registered with the NFA/CFTC, US residents cannot legally fund an account, receive a live feed, or execute trades. If you are a US trader, the only relevant cost comparison is among regulated domestic brokers that offer NFA-compliant pricing and support USD-denominated accounts with Bank Wire, ACH, and Credit Card deposits.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeIC MarketsMoneta Markets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$200$50
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - United States Traders

Entity / AssetIC MarketsMoneta Markets
United States (offshore)Up to 1:5000Up to 1:1000
Forex major pairs1:50001:1000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for United States Traders
Traders in United States typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassIC MarketsMoneta MarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+IC Markets
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesIC Markets
Crypto CFDs30+IC Markets
Stocks / Share CFDsMoneta Markets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformIC MarketsMoneta Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

IC Markets provides MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and cTrader, making it a favorite among algorithmic traders and scalpers who require advanced charting tools and low-latency execution. cTrader’s depth-of-market and custom automation features are particularly popular with serious USD traders. Moneta Markets also offers MT4 and MT5, but does not include cTrader, and its platform suite is generally simpler and better suited to beginner and intermediate traders. For United States traders, platform choice is not the deciding factor because neither broker is authorized to serve US residents. The NFA/CFTC regulatory framework requires US brokers to offer stable, fully compliant platforms—typically MT4 and proprietary web platforms—with data feeds limited to NFA-approved liquidity providers. When comparing platforms, US traders should instead evaluate which regulated broker offers the best execution, charting, and mobile experience while remaining fully compliant with US law.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorIC MarketsMoneta MarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNMoneta Markets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msIC Markets
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

IC Markets is renowned for its low-latency execution, with dedicated servers in major liquidity centers and access to institutional-grade liquidity. Moneta Markets uses solid STP/ECN execution, but its spreads and order execution speeds are generally less consistent during volatile sessions. For United States traders, execution quality is a secondary factor because both brokers fail to meet the threshold of NFA/CFTC registration. A US trader evaluating execution should compare regulated domestic brokers that offer tight spreads under NFA leverage restrictions and demonstrate strong fill rates during major news events.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for United States Traders

Safety FactorIC MarketsMoneta Markets
Primary regulatorASICASIC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

IC Markets is regulated in multiple international jurisdictions, including the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Financial Services Authority (FSA) of Seychelles, and CySEC for EU clients. Moneta Markets also holds several offshore and international licenses, but neither broker has obtained NFA membership or CFTC registration in the United States. For US traders, this regulatory gap means there is no legal pathway to trade with these brokers. The NFA/CFTC imposes strict leverage limits (up to 50:1 for major FX), mandatory registration, and segregated client funds requirements. An unregulated offshore broker may offer higher leverage, but it exposes US traders to legal penalties, lack of recourse in disputes, and zero protection from the US investor compensation schemes. Therefore, any comparison of IC Markets vs Moneta Markets for United States traders must conclude that regulatory disqualification overrides all other advantages.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for United States traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for United States

Payment MethodIC MarketsMoneta Markets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeE-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 daysInternal Processing: Generally handled within 24 hours by the finance team.Credit/Debit Cards: 1 to 5 business days to fully reflect.Bank Wire / International Transfers: 3 to 5 business days to complete.

For United States traders, deposit and withdrawal options are tightly linked to regulatory status. NFA/CFTC-compliant brokers operating in the US typically accept Bank Wire, ACH, and Credit Card funding. Bank Wire is reliable for large sums, ACH is the standard direct bank transfer method with low fees, and Credit Card offers instant processing for smaller deposits. Withdrawals are generally processed back to the same funding source to meet anti-money laundering rules. But with IC Markets and Moneta Markets, none of these methods are available to US residents because account opening is blocked. IC Markets, for its non-US clients, supports Bank Wire, Credit/Debit Cards, Skrill, Neteller, and various local payment methods. Moneta Markets offers similar options including Bank Wire and Cards. If a US trader tries to fund through an offshore account, the payment processor may reject the transaction, and the broker could freeze funds for violating its terms. The only safe approach for US traders is to stick with an NFA-regulated broker that explicitly supports Bank Wire, ACH, Credit Card deposits and provides transparent USD-denominated withdrawals.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for United States Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureIC MarketsMoneta Markets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

IC Markets and Moneta Markets both provide Islamic swap-free accounts that comply with Sharia law, eliminating overnight interest charges on leveraged positions. These accounts are offered to traders in jurisdictions where swap-free trading is permitted. However, for United States residents, Islamic accounts are not available because neither broker is allowed to offer any product to US persons. The NFA/CFTC regulations do not prohibit swap-free accounts outright, but they mandate that all retail forex accounts must be held by an NFA member. Since IC Markets and Moneta Markets are not members, a US-based Muslim trader cannot legally open a swap-free account with them. Instead, US Muslim traders should look for NFA/CFTC-regulated brokers that offer swap-free account types within their compliance framework, though such options are rare and must be confirmed directly with the broker.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureIC MarketsMoneta MarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesIC Markets

IC Markets offers 24/5 multilingual support via live chat, email, and phone, with a comprehensive knowledge base and fast response times. Moneta Markets also provides 24/5 support in several languages, though its phone coverage is more limited. For United States traders, however, customer support responsiveness from these offshore brokers is irrelevant because accessing their services violates US regulations. If you encounter a platform issue, you would have no standing to file a complaint with the NFA or CFTC. US traders should prioritize brokers with dedicated US-based support teams and clear NFA compliance procedures.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureIC MarketsMoneta MarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsIC Markets
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsIC Markets
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceIC MarketsMoneta MarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)Tie
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicIC Markets

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
IC Markets
★★★★★
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
Moneta Markets
★★★★★
0.5K
508 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support

Moneta Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - United States Guide

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • live outside the US and want raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips
  • are a scalper or algorithmic trader using cTrader
  • prioritize institutional-grade liquidity and low-latency execution
  • prefer a broker with strong global regulation (ASIC, FSA, CySEC) and are not subject to US restrictions

Choose Moneta Markets if you...

  • are a non-US beginner looking for a commission-free account with low spreads
  • want access to MT4/MT5 with a simpler account structure
  • value educational guides and user-friendly trading resources
  • are comfortable with offshore regulation and have confirmed that Moneta accepts your jurisdiction

FAQ - IC Markets vs Moneta Markets in United States

Is IC Markets or Moneta Markets better for United States? +
Can United States traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for United States traders? +
How do United States traders deposit at IC Markets and Moneta Markets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for United States? +

Final Verdict - United States 2026

IC Markets wins overall

For United States traders, the comparison between IC Markets and Moneta Markets ends with a clear verdict: neither broker should be used. Both are reputable in the global retail forex space, but they do not hold NFA/CFTC registrations and cannot legally accept US residents. Banking with either broker would expose US traders to severe legal consequences, payment complications, and the complete absence of domestic investor protections. The only sensible path is to choose a fully regulated US broker that supports Bank Wire, ACH, and Credit Card deposits, offers lower leverage under NFA rules, and provides local USD accounts. IC Markets would be the preferred choice for non-US traders who need low spreads and advanced platforms, while Moneta Markets suits those who prefer a simpler, commission-free experience. But within the United States, regulatory compliance takes priority over fees and features. Select an NFA/CFTC-compliant broker and avoid offshore alternatives entirely.

Open IC MarketsOpen Moneta Markets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for United States traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
IC Markets Winner3.6/5
Moneta Markets 3.3/5
Similar Comparisons
Ic Markets Vs ExnessMoneta Markets Vs ExnessIc Markets Vs Xm GroupMoneta Markets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in United States
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.