HomeCompareIC Markets vs Capital.comJapan
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
Japan
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

IC Markets vs Capital.com: Japan Trader Comparison 2026

Which broker is better for Japan traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
VS
Capital.com logo
Capital.com
FCA · ASIC · CySEC · Founded 2016
Open Account
Winner: IC Markets
Categories: 12 compared
For: Japan traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Japan Traders

Best Overall
IC Markets
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
Capital.com
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
IC Markets
Swap-free for Japan Muslims
Best for Beginners
IC Markets
Better education & support
$200 vs $20
Min deposit
1:5000 vs 1:200
Max leverage
ASIC vs FCA
Top regulator
3.6 vs 3.3
Our scores
Table of Contents

Japan traders looking for a reliable forex broker often compare IC Markets and Capital.com, two leading international brokers with strong global reputations. IC Markets, scoring 4.8/5, is known for its ultra-low spreads and institutional-grade execution, making it a top choice for sophisticated traders in Japan. Capital.com, scoring 3.8/5, offers a user-friendly platform with advanced charting and educational tools, appealing to both new and experienced traders. For Japan residents, both brokers accept JPY deposits via Bank Transfer and Credit Card, and they operate without direct FSA Japan regulation, which is common for offshore brokers. This comparison focuses on trading costs, platforms, regulation, and payment methods tailored to Japan traders, helping you decide which broker fits your forex trading style in 2026. Whether you prioritize low spreads or ease of use, understanding these differences is key to successful trading in Japan.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
Capital.com
Capital.com
FCA · ASIC · CySEC
3.3
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.7
WIN
3.4
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.8
WIN
3.0
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.9
WIN
3.6
Deposits
Local payments
3.7
WIN
3.3
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.4
WIN
3.1
Education
Webinars, guides
3.3
WIN
3.0
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.7
WIN
3.1
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.6
WIN
3.3
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentIC MarketsCapital.comWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotCapital.com
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalCapital.com
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsCapital.com
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsCapital.com
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$200$20Capital.com

For Japan traders, trading costs are a critical factor, especially when trading USD/JPY and other yen pairs. IC Markets offers raw spreads from 0.0 pips on its Raw Spread account with a commission of $3.50 per lot per side, while Capital.com provides spreads from 0.6 pips with no commission on standard accounts. For a Japan trader executing 100 lots per month on USD/JPY, IC Markets can save up to $500 in spread costs compared to Capital.com. IC Markets also offers a True ECN environment with lower swap rates, which benefits long-term position traders in Japan. Capital.com’s costs are higher but include no commission on certain account types, making it simpler for casual traders. Overall, IC Markets is more cost-effective for active Japan traders.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeIC MarketsCapital.com
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$200$20
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Japan Traders

Entity / AssetIC MarketsCapital.com
Japan (offshore)Up to 1:5000Up to 1:200
Forex major pairs1:50001:200
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Japan Traders
Traders in Japan typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassIC MarketsCapital.comWinner
Forex pairs90+65+IC Markets
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesIC Markets
Crypto CFDs30+20+IC Markets
Stocks / Share CFDs1,700+Capital.com
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformIC MarketsCapital.com
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Japan traders demand fast, reliable platforms, and both brokers deliver. IC Markets offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and cTrader, all popular among sophisticated traders for their advanced charting, algorithmic trading, and low latency. Capital.com provides its proprietary web platform and mobile app, which feature AI-driven insights and a clean interface, but lack the depth of MT4/MT5. For Japan traders who use Expert Advisors (EAs) or custom indicators, IC Markets is the clear choice. Capital.com’s platform is easier to navigate but may not satisfy advanced trading needs. Both platforms are available in Japanese language, ensuring smooth usability.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorIC MarketsCapital.comWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNCapital.com
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msIC Markets
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

Execution quality is vital for Japan traders, especially for scalping and high-frequency strategies. IC Markets offers true ECN execution with no requotes, average execution speed of 40ms, and deep liquidity from multiple banks. Capital.com uses STP execution with speeds around 100ms, which is reliable but slower. For Japan traders trading volatile yen pairs during Tokyo session, IC Markets’ faster execution and tighter slippage control provide a clear advantage. Capital.com is adequate for swing traders but not ideal for scalpers.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Japan Traders

Safety FactorIC MarketsCapital.com
Primary regulatorASICFCA
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

Regulation is a key concern for Japan traders, as the FSA Japan oversees local brokers but does not regulate IC Markets or Capital.com directly. IC Markets is regulated by ASIC (Australia) and CySEC (Cyprus), while Capital.com is regulated by the FCA (UK) and CySEC. Neither broker holds a Japanese license, meaning Japan traders use offshore entities. This is common for international brokers serving Japan, but traders should be aware that deposit insurance (like Japan’s Investor Protection Fund) does not apply. Both brokers have strong reputations and segregate client funds, offering a similar level of safety. Japan traders should verify their own legal obligations when trading with unregulated brokers.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Japan traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Japan

Payment MethodIC MarketsCapital.com
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeE-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days24 hours

Japan traders can fund their accounts at both IC Markets and Capital.com using Bank Transfer and Credit Card, with JPY accepted for deposits. IC Markets supports additional methods like PayPal, Skrill, and Neteller, with a minimum deposit of $200 (approx. ¥30,000). Capital.com offers a lower minimum of $20 (approx. ¥3,000) and also accepts Apple Pay and Google Pay, making it more accessible for smaller accounts. Withdrawals are processed quickly: IC Markets within 1-2 business days for credit cards and e-wallets, while Capital.com typically takes 1-3 days. Bank transfers may take 3-5 days for both. For Japan traders, Capital.com’s lower deposit threshold is a plus, but IC Markets offers more flexibility with multiple e-wallet options.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Japan Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureIC MarketsCapital.com
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

For Japan Muslim traders seeking Sharia-compliant trading, both IC Markets and Capital.com offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts. IC Markets provides swap-free accounts upon request, applicable to most account types, with no overnight interest charges on positions held beyond one day. Capital.com offers Islamic accounts automatically for eligible clients, also with zero swap fees and no hidden costs. Both brokers ensure compliance with Islamic finance principles, but IC Markets requires a manual request, while Capital.com streamlines the process. Japan traders should note that swap-free accounts may have limited trading periods or instrument exclusions, so checking terms with each broker is recommended before opening an account.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureIC MarketsCapital.comWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesIC Markets

Customer support is crucial for Japan traders, and both brokers offer 24/7 multilingual support. IC Markets provides live chat, email, and phone support in Japanese, with quick response times (under 30 seconds for live chat). Capital.com also offers Japanese-language support via live chat and email, but phone support is limited to English. IC Markets’ support team is more responsive for technical issues, while Capital.com excels in educational assistance. For Japan traders, IC Markets’ dedicated phone line in Japanese is a standout feature, ensuring clear communication during trading hours.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureIC MarketsCapital.comWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsIC Markets
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsIC Markets
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceIC MarketsCapital.comWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)Tie
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicIC Markets

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
IC Markets
★★★★★
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
Capital.com
★★★★★
14.4K
14,400 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support

Capital.com

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Japan Guide

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Are a sophisticated Japan trader focusing on low spreads and high-volume trading.
  • Use Expert Advisors (EAs) or algorithmic trading strategies on MT4/MT5/cTrader.
  • Need fast execution for scalping USD/JPY during Tokyo hours.
  • Prefer multiple e-wallet deposit options like PayPal and Skrill alongside Bank Transfer.

Choose Capital.com if you...

  • Are a beginner or intermediate Japan trader seeking a simple, educational platform.
  • Want to start with a low minimum deposit (¥3,000) using Credit Card or Apple Pay.
  • Prefer a broker with AI-driven insights and a clean mobile app.
  • Value built-in risk management tools like guaranteed stop-loss orders.

FAQ - IC Markets vs Capital.com in Japan

Is IC Markets or Capital.com better for Japan? +
Can Japan traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Japan traders? +
How do Japan traders deposit at IC Markets and Capital.com? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Japan? +

Final Verdict - Japan 2026

IC Markets wins overall

For Japan traders, IC Markets is the superior choice for sophisticated, active trading due to its ultra-low spreads, fast execution, and advanced platforms like MT4 and cTrader. Its support for Bank Transfer and Credit Card deposits, along with e-wallet options, makes funding convenient in JPY. Capital.com, while user-friendly and accessible with a low minimum deposit, falls short in trading costs and execution speed. Although neither broker is regulated by the FSA Japan, both are reputable offshore entities. For Japan traders prioritizing cost efficiency and performance, IC Markets wins decisively. Capital.com is a solid alternative for beginners or those who value simplicity and educational tools. Consider your trading style and volume before deciding.

Open IC MarketsOpen Capital.com
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Japan traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
IC Markets Winner3.6/5
Capital.com 3.3/5
Similar Comparisons
Ic Markets Vs ExnessCapitalcom Vs ExnessIc Markets Vs Xm GroupCapitalcom Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in Japan
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.