Which broker is better for Chile traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
For experienced retail traders in Chile, choosing between FXTM and Tickmill is a critical decision that impacts your trading costs, platform experience, and overall profitability. Both brokers are well-established internationally, but they cater to slightly different trading styles. FXTM (ForexTime) boasts a higher overall rating of 4.3/5, offering a comprehensive suite of educational tools, multiple account types, and strong brand recognition. Tickmill, rated 4/5, is renowned for its ultra-low spreads and lightning-fast execution, making it a favorite among scalpers and algorithmic traders. As a Chile-based trader, you’ll benefit from both brokers accepting local deposit methods like Bank Transfer and Credit Card, and you can trade in CLP-equivalent values. However, neither broker is directly regulated by the CMF Chile, so you must rely on their international licenses (e.g., FCA, CySEC). This comparison will help you navigate the nuances of spreads, platforms, and local support to find the best fit for your trading journey.
| Instrument | FXTM | Tickmill | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | Tickmill |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | Tickmill |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | Tickmill |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | Tickmill |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $200 | $100 | Tickmill |
When comparing trading costs for Chile traders, Tickmill generally has the edge with its Raw account offering spreads from 0.0 pips and a commission of $3 per lot per side. This is ideal for high-volume traders who need to minimize every pip of cost. FXTM’s spreads start from 1.0 pip on its Standard account (no commission) and from 0.0 pips on its ECN account with a $7 commission per lot. For a Chile trader executing 10 lots per month, Tickmill could save up to $80 in spread costs compared to FXTM’s standard account. However, FXTM’s zero-commission accounts may be simpler for those who dislike calculating commissions. Both brokers offer competitive pricing, but Tickmill is the clear winner for cost-conscious scalpers.
| Account Type | FXTM | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✓ | ✗ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Copy trading | ✓ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $200 | $100 |
| Entity / Asset | FXTM | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Chile (offshore) | Up to 1:3000 | Up to 1:1000 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:3000 | 1:1000 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | FXTM | Tickmill | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | FXTM |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | FXTM |
| Crypto CFDs | ✗ | ✗ | FXTM |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | ✗ | Tickmill |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | FXTM | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✓ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✓ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✗ |
| TradingView | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Both FXTM and Tickmill offer the industry-standard MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5) platforms, which are popular among experienced Chile traders for their advanced charting tools, automated trading capabilities, and custom indicators. FXTM goes a step further with its proprietary FXTM Trader app, which provides a streamlined mobile experience and access to exclusive analysis. Tickmill focuses on raw performance with MT4/MT5, ensuring low latency and fast order execution. For Chile traders who value a clean, no-frills platform with maximum speed, Tickmill’s MT4/MT5 setup is ideal. If you prefer additional tools and a mobile-friendly proprietary app, FXTM’s platform ecosystem is more versatile.
| Factor | FXTM | Tickmill | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | Tickmill |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | FXTM |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
Execution quality is a key differentiator: Tickmill is renowned for its ultra-fast order execution, with average speeds under 40 milliseconds, making it ideal for scalping and high-frequency strategies. FXTM also offers fast execution, but its average is slightly higher at around 60 milliseconds. Both brokers use No Dealing Desk (NDD) execution on their ECN accounts, ensuring no requotes. For Chile traders who prioritize speed and minimal slippage, Tickmill’s execution is superior. FXTM provides reliable execution but is better suited for swing traders and position traders who are less sensitive to latency.
| Safety Factor | FXTM | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | FCA | FCA |
| Top-tier regulated | ✓ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Regulation is a critical consideration for Chile traders, as neither FXTM nor Tickmill holds a license from the CMF Chile. FXTM is regulated by top-tier authorities including the FCA (UK) and CySEC (Cyprus), providing a high level of client fund segregation and negative balance protection. Tickmill is regulated by the FCA, CySEC, and the FSA (Seychelles). While both are reputable, the absence of local CMF oversight means that Chile traders are not covered by Chilean investor compensation schemes. You should verify that your chosen broker offers negative balance protection and segregated accounts. For maximum safety, opt for the FCA-regulated entity, which offers the strongest protection under UK law.
| Payment Method | FXTM | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neteller | ✓ | ✓ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✓ | ✗ |
| Withdrawal time | 24 hours (often in 30 minutes),Credit / Debit Cards (Visa, Mastercard): 1 to 3 business days. | Most withdrawals 1 business day; bank wire 1-3 days, Credit/Debit Cards: Up to 8 working days. |
Chile traders can fund their accounts at both FXTM and Tickmill using Bank Transfer and Credit Card, with no deposit fees charged by either broker. FXTM processes Credit Card deposits instantly, while Bank Transfers may take 1-3 business days and can incur intermediary bank fees (typically $10-$20 USD). Tickmill also supports Credit Card and Bank Transfer, with similar processing times. Minimum deposits vary: FXTM requires a minimum of $100 USD (or CLP equivalent), while Tickmill also asks for $100 USD. Withdrawals are generally processed within 24 hours for Credit Cards and 1-3 days for Bank Transfers. Always check your bank’s conversion rates when depositing in CLP, as both brokers operate in USD. For large deposits, Bank Transfer is more cost-effective, while Credit Card offers speed.
| Islamic Account Feature | FXTM | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
For Chilean Muslim traders who require Sharia-compliant accounts, both FXTM and Tickmill offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts upon request. FXTM provides swap-free accounts for an extended period (up to 180 days) with no additional charges, but positions held beyond this may incur a fee. Tickmill also offers swap-free accounts with no overnight interest, but eligibility is subject to verification of religious affiliation. Chile traders should contact support to confirm specific terms, as conditions can vary by account type and regulatory entity. Both brokers are accommodating, making them viable options for those seeking halal trading.
| Support Feature | FXTM | Tickmill | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | FXTM |
Customer support is available 24/5 for both brokers, with multilingual teams including Spanish-speaking agents. FXTM offers live chat, email, and phone support, with a reputation for prompt responses. Tickmill also provides live chat and email support, with slightly faster response times for technical issues. For Chile traders, Spanish support is available, but the quality can vary. FXTM’s larger support team may offer more consistent service, while Tickmill’s smaller team is known for personalized assistance. Both brokers have comprehensive FAQ sections on their websites.
| Mobile Feature | FXTM | Tickmill | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | FXTM |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | FXTM |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Resource | FXTM | Tickmill | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | ✗ | FXTM |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | FXTM |
Choose FXTM if you...
Choose Tickmill if you...
For experienced Chile traders, the choice between FXTM and Tickmill ultimately depends on your trading style and priorities. FXTM offers a more comprehensive package with a higher rating, diverse account types, and strong educational support, making it ideal for traders who value tools and resources alongside competitive costs. Tickmill, on the other hand, excels in raw cost efficiency and execution speed, making it the go-to broker for scalpers and volume-focused traders. Both brokers support local deposit methods like Bank Transfer and Credit Card, and while neither is regulated by CMF Chile, their tier-1 licenses provide a solid safety net. If you prioritize low spreads and fast execution, choose Tickmill. If you want a well-rounded broker with more features, FXTM is your best bet in 2026.