Which broker is better for China traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
For Chinese traders operating offshore, choosing the right broker is critical due to capital controls, regulatory requirements, and the need for reliable international exposure. Forex.com (rated 3.4/5) and IC Markets (rated 4.8/5) are two global brokers that accept clients from China and support local payment methods like USDT and international bank transfers. Both offer access to major forex pairs, indices, commodities, and CFDs, but they differ significantly in costs, platforms, and execution. With CSRC oversight limited to domestic brokers, Chinese traders must rely on international regulators such as the FCA, ASIC, and CySEC. This comparison focuses on the specific needs of China-based traders, including deposit flexibility, spread competitiveness, and regulatory trust. Whether you are a scalper, a long-term investor, or a Muslim trader seeking Islamic accounts, understanding the nuances of these brokers will help you make an informed decision in 2025.
| Instrument | Forex.com | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | IC Markets |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | IC Markets |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | IC Markets |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | IC Markets |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $100 | $200 | Forex.com |
Cost efficiency is a top priority for China traders who often trade high volumes to overcome small profit margins. IC Markets offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips on its Raw Spread account with a commission of $3.5 per lot per side on MT4/MT5. Forex.com's standard account has spreads averaging 1.2 pips on EUR/USD, though its commission-based Raw account can lower costs slightly. For scalpers and algorithmic traders, IC Markets' lower spreads and faster execution reduce transaction costs significantly. Spreads on cross pairs like USD/CNH (offshore yuan) are also tighter at IC Markets, giving China traders a direct advantage when trading yuan pairs.
| Account Type | Forex.com | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $100 | $200 |
| Entity / Asset | Forex.com | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| China (offshore) | Up to 1:50 | Up to 1:5000 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:50 | 1:5000 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | Forex.com | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | Forex.com |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | Forex.com |
| Crypto CFDs | 30+ | 20+ | Forex.com |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | ✗ | IC Markets |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | Forex.com | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✗ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✓ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✓ | ✓ |
| TradingView | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Both brokers offer MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), which are the preferred platforms for most China traders due to their advanced charting, automated trading via Expert Advisors (EAs), and custom indicators. IC Markets also supports cTrader, which offers an intuitive interface and depth-of-market features. Forex.com provides its own proprietary web platform and TradingView integration, but lacks cTrader. For China traders who rely on EA strategies or require multiple timeframes, IC Markets' platform diversity and low latency are key advantages. Both offer mobile apps for Android and iOS, but IC Markets' execution speed on mobile is slightly faster.
| Factor | Forex.com | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | IC Markets |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | Forex.com |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
IC Markets is known for its low-latency execution, with average speeds under 30ms on its Equinix NY4 servers, making it ideal for scalpers and high-frequency traders in China who demand rapid order fills. Forex.com's execution is also reliable but slightly slower, averaging 40-50ms. IC Markets offers no-dealing-desk (NDD) execution with straight-through processing, minimizing requotes. Forex.com uses a combination of market maker and NDD models, which can lead to occasional slippage during news events. For China traders who trade volatile sessions like Asia-Pacific overlaps, IC Markets' execution quality is superior.
| Safety Factor | Forex.com | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | FCA | ASIC |
| Top-tier regulated | ✓ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Forex.com is regulated by the FCA in the UK, ASIC in Australia, and CFTC/NFA in the US, providing strong investor protection through schemes like the FSCS (up to £85,000). IC Markets is regulated by ASIC, CySEC, and the FSA in Seychelles, offering tier-1 and tier-2 oversight. For China traders, neither broker falls under CSRC jurisdiction, so it is crucial to understand that your funds are not protected by Chinese laws. However, FCA and ASIC regulation are among the most rigorous globally. IC Markets' ASIC license ensures strict client money segregation, while Forex.com's FCA backing offers compensation schemes. Both brokers have clean regulatory records, but IC Markets' larger global trust base (rated 4.8/5) appeals to experienced offshore traders.
| Payment Method | Forex.com | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✗ | ✓ |
| Neteller | ✗ | ✓ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✗ | ✓ |
| Withdrawal time | 1 to 3 business days | E-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days |
China traders can fund both accounts via USDT (Tether) using TRC20 or ERC20 networks, which bypasses capital controls and speeds up deposits. International bank transfers (SWIFT) are also accepted, but processing times range from 3-5 business days. Forex.com supports credit/debit cards and PayPal, while IC Markets offers Skrill, Neteller, and broker-to-broker transfers. Withdrawals are processed similarly, with USDT often being the fastest (same day) and cheapest method. IC Markets charges no internal fees for most withdrawal methods, though bank wire fees may apply. Forex.com may charge a small fee for wire transfers. Both brokers require KYC documentation including passport and proof of address, which is standard for offshore accounts.
| Islamic Account Feature | Forex.com | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✗ | ✓ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
For Muslim traders in China who require Sharia-compliant accounts, both Forex.com and IC Markets offer swap-free Islamic accounts that do not charge or pay overnight interest. IC Markets provides Islamic accounts on all its account types (Standard, Raw Spread, and cTrader) with no additional restrictions. Forex.com offers Islamic accounts but only under certain regulatory jurisdictions (e.g., offshore entities) and may impose a holding period before allowing the account. Traders should note that Islamic accounts may have slightly wider spreads to compensate for the lack of swap charges. Both brokers require a formal request and may ask for proof of Muslim faith.
| Support Feature | Forex.com | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | Forex.com |
IC Markets offers 24/7 multilingual customer support via live chat, email, and phone, with Chinese language support available during Asian trading hours. Forex.com provides 24/5 live chat and phone support, with limited Chinese-language assistance. For China traders operating in Asian time zones, IC Markets' round-the-clock support is a clear advantage. Response times are faster at IC Markets, typically under 30 seconds for live chat, while Forex.com may take up to 2 minutes. Both brokers have comprehensive FAQ sections and educational resources.
| Mobile Feature | Forex.com | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | Forex.com |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | Forex.com |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Resource | Forex.com | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | ✗ | Forex.com |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | Forex.com |
Choose Forex.com if you...
Choose IC Markets if you...
For China traders seeking international exposure in 2025, IC Markets is the clear winner with a 4.8/5 rating, backed by tighter spreads, faster execution, and better support for USDT deposits. Its raw pricing model suits both small and large accounts, while Forex.com's higher spreads and slightly slower execution make it less competitive for active traders. However, Forex.com's FCA regulation offers a stronger safety net for those concerned about broker stability. Given the unique constraints of trading from China—such as capital controls and reliance on USDT—IC Markets' flexibility and lower costs align more with the needs of offshore traders. We recommend IC Markets for best overall value, but Forex.com remains a solid alternative for beginners or those prioritizing regulatory authority.