HomeCompareFBS Max vs TickmillAustralia
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
August 2026
🌍
Country
Australia
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

FBS Max vs Tickmill (2026): Australia Trader Comparison

Which broker is better for Australia traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS Max logo
FBS Max
IFSC · Founded 2021
Open Account
VS
Tickmill logo
Tickmill
FCA · CySEC · FSCA · Founded 2014
Open Account
Winner: FBS Max
Categories: 12 compared
For: Australia traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Australia Traders

Best Overall
FBS Max
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
Tickmill
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Tickmill
Swap-free for Australia Muslims
Best for Beginners
FBS Max
Better education & support
$0 vs $100
Min deposit
1:3000 vs 1:1000
Max leverage
IFSC vs FCA
Top regulator
3.7 vs 3.3
Our scores
Table of Contents

Australia traders comparing FBS Max vs Tickmill in 2026 face a classic choice between platform flexibility and raw execution cost. Both brokers are regulated by ASIC under the Australian financial services regime, giving residents the comfort of local regulatory oversight, client money segregation, and negative balance protection. But their models diverge significantly: FBS Max appeals with multiple account types, higher leverage options for international clients, and a more feature-heavy trading environment, while Tickmill focuses on tight raw spreads, transparent commission-based pricing, and fast execution. For experienced Australian traders who value cost efficiency and institutional-style conditions, Tickmill's 4/5 review score reflects its strength in this area. However, FBS Max, with a 3.7/5 score, remains a strong contender due to its user-friendly interface, broader asset selection, and support for popular local payment methods like BPAY and POLi. This comparison breaks down every factor that matters to an Australian trader — from AUD deposit options to ASIC licensing, spread costs, and platform reliability — so you can decide which broker aligns with your trading style and jurisdictional needs.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

FBS Max
FBS Max
IFSC
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
Tickmill
Tickmill
FCA · CySEC · FSCA
3.3
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.8
WIN
3.4
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.9
WIN
3.0
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.2
3.6
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.8
WIN
3.4
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.5
WIN
3.1
Education
Webinars, guides
3.4
WIN
3.0
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.8
WIN
3.4
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.7
WIN
3.3
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentFBS MaxTickmillWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotTickmill
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalTickmill
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsTickmill
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsTickmill
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$0$100FBS Max

For Australia traders, spread costs are often the deciding factor between FBS Max and Tickmill. Tickmill's Raw account offers spreads from 0.0 pips on major pairs like AUD/USD, paired with a commission of USD 3.5 per side per lot. In contrast, FBS Max's standard account has spreads starting around 0.7 pips with no commission. Consider a typical week of scalping 10 lots on EUR/USD: Tickmill’s total cost is approximately USD 70 in commission plus minimal spread, while FBS Max’s spread cost alone could be USD 70–100, depending on market conditions. That difference adds up to hundreds of AUD per month for active traders. Tickmill also offers a Classic account with zero commission but slightly wider spreads, giving Australian traders the flexibility to choose their cost model. FBS Max occasionally runs deposit bonuses, but those come with volume requirements that can inflate effective trading costs. For high-volume experienced traders, Tickmill is the more cost-effective broker.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeFBS MaxTickmill
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$0$100
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Australia Traders

Entity / AssetFBS MaxTickmill
Australia (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:1000
Forex major pairs1:30001:1000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Australia Traders
Traders in Australia typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassFBS MaxTickmillWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS Max
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS Max
Crypto CFDs30+FBS Max
Stocks / Share CFDsTickmill
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformFBS MaxTickmill
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both brokers offer MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, which are staples for Australian traders. Tickmill also provides the WebTrader platform for browser-based trading and a mobile app with full functionality, ensuring you can monitor AUD/USD, gold, and indices from anywhere in Australia. FBS Max matches with MT4/MT5 but adds its own FBS Trader app, which is more oriented toward social trading and copy trading — a feature attractive to newer traders, though less relevant for the experienced profile this comparison targets. In terms of platform stability and execution speed, Tickmill has a slight edge due to its low-latency servers in Tokyo and New York, which reduces order routing time for Australian clients. FBS Max, on the other hand, offers more advanced copy-trading tools and market analysis directly within the platform. For an experienced trader relying on fast charting, quick order placement, and reliable algorithmic trading, both support EAs on MT4/MT5, but Tickmill's infrastructure is generally considered more robust for professional use.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorFBS MaxTickmillWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNTickmill
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS Max
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

Execution quality is where Tickmill differentiates itself. It uses an STP/ECN model with deep liquidity providers and low-latency connectivity via Equinix NY4 and LD5 servers, with a reported average execution time of 0.2–0.3 seconds. FBS Max also uses an STP model, but its execution is more reliant on internal liquidity, leading to occasional slippage during high-impact news events like RBA interest rate decisions. For an Australian trader scalping or using algorithmic strategies, Tickmill’s consistent fills and negligible re-quotes are vital. FBS Max offers negative balance protection, but its execution transparency is lower, and slippage spikes during volatile AUD pairs like AUD/USD and AUD/JPY. Additionally, Tickmill has no dealing desk intervention, while FBS Max may widen spreads slightly during London/NY overlap. For high-frequency and short-term strategies, Tickmill is the superior executor.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Australia Traders

Safety FactorFBS MaxTickmill
Primary regulatorIFSCFCA
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

FBS Max and Tickmill both hold Australian Financial Services (AFS) licences issued by ASIC, which is a critical safeguard for Australia traders. ASIC regulation means your funds are held in segregated client accounts with major Australian banks, and you benefit from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) disputes resolution scheme. Tickmill’s Australian entity (Tickmill AU Pty Ltd) has a long-standing AFSL and also operates under FCA and CySEC regulation for other regions, strengthening its oversight. FBS Max, via its FBS Markets Pty Ltd entity, also holds an AFSL, but its compliance history is less extensive than Tickmill’s. For experienced Australian traders, the key practical difference is the leverage cap: ASIC mandates a maximum of 1:30 for retail forex trading. Both brokers comply, but FBS Max offers higher leverage via its offshore entities — a practice that ASIC warns against because it removes local protections. Stick with the ASIC-regulated entities to ensure your legal safeguards and access to AFCA remain intact.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Australia traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Australia

Payment MethodFBS MaxTickmill
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal time5 to 7 business daysMost withdrawals 1 business day; bank wire 1-3 days, Credit/Debit Cards: Up to 8 working days.

Australian traders can fund both FBS Max and Tickmill using local payment methods that are fast and familiar: BPAY, POLi, bank transfer, and credit cards (Visa/Mastercard). BPAY is a standout for both brokers because it lets you initiate a payment directly from your Australian bank account without leaving your banking portal. POLi also offers instant AUD deposits with no fees from either broker, making it ideal for quick account funding. Bank transfer via AUD SWIFT or local Australian bank transfer is free but can take 1–3 business days to clear. Credit card deposits are instant, and while most Australian-issued cards are accepted, some banks may classify CFD transactions as cash advances — check with your provider. Withdrawals: Tickmill processes withdrawal requests within 24 hours, while FBS Max may take up to 3 business days. Both require you to withdraw back to the original payment method, so BPAY deposits must return as bank transfer. No deposit or withdrawal fees are charged by either broker for AUD transactions, but international bank transfer fees may apply if your account is under a non-AU entity.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Australia Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureFBS MaxTickmill
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Muslim traders in Australia will find both FBS Max and Tickmill accommodating of their religious requirements. Tickmill offers Islamic accounts on its Pro and Raw account types, which are swap-free across all forex pairs, metals, and indices, with no expiry date for the swap-free status. FBS Max also provides Islamic accounts, but the process is request-based: you must contact support to enable swap-free, and it applies to standard account versions only. One important difference: Tickmill removes swap on all position types, while FBS Max may still charge a small administrative fee on positions held longer than a certain period (often 3 days). For Australian Muslim traders who hold positions overnight, Tickmill offers a cleaner, more transparent Islamic trading experience. Always verify current terms with each broker, as policies can change with regulatory updates.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureFBS MaxTickmillWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS Max

Australian traders need responsive support across multiple time zones, and both brokers deliver 24/5 support via live chat, email, and phone. Tickmill provides a dedicated Australian phone number and local Sydney-based support team, which is a clear advantage for addressing account or payment issues quickly. FBS Max offers global English support via live chat and email, but phone lines are not local to Australia, and response times may be slower during peak ASIC market hours. Both have extensive FAQs, but Tickmill’s support is more personalised and faster for Australian-specific queries like BPAY processing or ASIC leverage restrictions. For urgent issues, Tickmill’s 24-hour withdrawal processing and direct phone access make it the more reliable choice for experienced traders.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureFBS MaxTickmillWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsFBS Max
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsFBS Max
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceFBS MaxTickmillWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)Tie
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS Max

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
FBS Max
-
Reviews unavailable
T
Tickmill
★★★★★
1.1K
1,080 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

FBS Max

Pros
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

Tickmill

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Australia Guide

Choose FBS Max if you...

  • Prefer a platform with built-in copy trading and social trading features to replicate advanced strategies.
  • Want the flexibility of multiple account types, including standard cent accounts or bonuses (though experienced traders rarely use these).
  • Trade occasional large positions and value the availability of broader asset coverage across CFDs and crypto.
  • Need access to an e-wallet like Skrill or Neteller alongside BPAY and POLi for depositing.

Choose Tickmill if you...

  • Are a scalper or algorithmic trader who needs tight raw spreads from 0.0 pips and ultra-fast execution.
  • Prefer a transparent commission-based cost structure with no hidden spreads during news events.
  • Want 24-hour withdrawal processing and a local Australian phone support line.
  • Trade high volumes where lower per-lot costs significantly impact your profitability.

FAQ - FBS Max vs Tickmill in Australia

Is FBS Max or Tickmill better for Australia? +
Can Australia traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Australia traders? +
How do Australia traders deposit at FBS Max and Tickmill? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Australia? +

Final Verdict - Australia 2026

FBS Max wins overall

After weighing the ASIC regulation, trading costs, payment methods, and execution quality, the verdict for Australian traders is clear: Tickmill is the stronger choice for experienced and cost-focused traders. Its raw spreads, low commissions, ultra-fast execution, and 24-hour withdrawal processing give it a tangible edge over FBS Max in every area that affects your bottom line. That said, FBS Max remains a viable option if you prefer a more feature-rich platform with copy trading and e-wallet support, and if you trade less frequently — then the spread differences are less severe. Both brokers support BPAY, POLi, bank transfer, and credit cards in AUD, but Tickmill's faster processing and local support tip the scales. For an Australia-based trader seeking an ASIC-regulated broker in 2026, Tickmill's 4/5 score vs FBS Max's 3.7/5 reflects the real-world experience you can expect. Open a demo account with both, but be prepared to fund your main account with Tickmill.

Open FBS MaxOpen Tickmill
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Australia traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
FBS Max Winner3.7/5
Tickmill 3.3/5
Similar Comparisons
Fbsmax Vs ExnessTickmill Vs ExnessFbsmax Vs Xm GroupTickmill Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in Australia
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.