Which broker is better for China traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
China traders seeking international exposure often compare FBS Max and RoboForex as offshore forex brokers. FBS Max, with a 3.7/5 rating, is known for low spreads and flexible deposits, while RoboForex (3.2/5) offers a broader asset selection. Both operate outside CSRC regulation, appealing to traders in China who want access to global markets via USDT or Bank Transfer (international). Local traders face unique challenges like capital controls, so choosing a broker with reliable payment channels is critical. This comparison covers trading costs, platforms, regulation, and deposit methods specifically for China-based users. Whether you are a day trader or long-term investor, understanding how these brokers serve the Chinese market will help you decide.
| Instrument | FBS Max | RoboForex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | RoboForex |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | RoboForex |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | RoboForex |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | RoboForex |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $0 | $10 | FBS Max |
For China traders, spread costs directly impact profitability. FBS Max offers spreads from 0.1 pips on EUR/USD, while RoboForex starts at 0.2 pips. With high trading volumes common among Chinese scalpers, FBS Max saves approximately 10-15% on transaction costs per lot. RoboForex has higher commission-based accounts for ECN trading, which may suit larger investors. When trading in CNY-equivalent lots, FBS Max’s lower spreads are more favorable for frequent traders.
| Account Type | FBS Max | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $0 | $10 |
| Entity / Asset | FBS Max | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| China (offshore) | Up to 1:3000 | Up to 1:2000 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:3000 | 1:2000 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | FBS Max | RoboForex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | FBS Max |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | FBS Max |
| Crypto CFDs | 30+ | 20+ | FBS Max |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | ✗ | RoboForex |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | FBS Max | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✓ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✓ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✓ | ✗ |
| TradingView | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Both brokers provide MetaTrader 4 and 5, essential for China traders. FBS Max also offers its proprietary FBS Trader app, which simplifies mobile trading. RoboForex supports cTrader in addition to MT4/5, appealing to algorithmic traders. For Chinese users, platform stability and Chinese language support are key; both brokers offer these, but FBS Max’s app is more intuitive for beginners.
| Factor | FBS Max | RoboForex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | RoboForex |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | FBS Max |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
FBS Max uses NDD execution with average speeds of 30-50ms, while RoboForex uses ECN/STP with speeds around 50-70ms. For China traders, FBS Max offers slightly faster execution, reducing slippage during volatile markets. RoboForex’s depth of market is better for large orders.
| Safety Factor | FBS Max | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | IFSC | IFSC |
| Top-tier regulated | ✗ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✗ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Neither FBS Max nor RoboForex is regulated by CSRC, so China traders must treat them as offshore entities. FBS Max is regulated by IFSC (Belize) and FSC (Mauritius), while RoboForex is regulated by IFSC. This means no CSRC investor protection, but both have segregated accounts and negative balance protection. China traders should prioritize brokers with transparent operations and strong dispute resolution.
| Payment Method | FBS Max | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neteller | ✓ | ✓ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✓ | ✓ |
| Withdrawal time | 5 to 7 business days | 1 to 5 business days |
China traders can deposit via USDT (Tether) and Bank Transfer (international) at both brokers. FBS Max also accepts local Chinese bank transfers (via third-party processors) and e-wallets like Perfect Money, making it more accessible. RoboForex focuses on international wire transfers and USDT, with slower processing times. Withdrawals at FBS Max are faster (1-2 days for USDT), while RoboForex may take 2-5 business days. Minimum deposits: FBS Max $10, RoboForex $10. For Chinese users, USDT is the fastest method, avoiding bank delays.
| Islamic Account Feature | FBS Max | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✗ | ✓ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
Both brokers offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Muslim traders in China. FBS Max provides a dedicated Islamic account with no swap fees on all instruments, while RoboForex offers swap-free conditions on its Standard and ECN accounts. Eligibility requires proof of Muslim faith or residency in a Muslim-majority region. FBS Max’s policy is more straightforward, with no hidden charges.
| Support Feature | FBS Max | RoboForex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | FBS Max |
FBS Max offers 24/7 live chat in Chinese, plus email and phone support. RoboForex provides 24/5 support with Chinese language options via email and live chat. FBS Max’s faster response times (under 1 minute) are better for China traders needing immediate help during Asian trading hours.
| Mobile Feature | FBS Max | RoboForex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | FBS Max |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | FBS Max |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Resource | FBS Max | RoboForex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | ✗ | Monthly | Tie |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | FBS Max |
Choose FBS Max if you...
Choose RoboForex if you...
For China traders, FBS Max edges out RoboForex with a 3.7 vs 3.2 rating, thanks to lower spreads, faster USDT deposits, and better Chinese support. RoboForex offers more platforms and instruments but higher costs. Given CSRC restrictions, both are viable only for offshore trading. If you prioritize low costs and quick deposits, choose FBS Max. For platform variety and larger trades, RoboForex may suit. Always use USDT for fastest transactions and check local laws.