Which broker is better for China traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
China traders looking for offshore forex exposure often compare FBS and FXTM, two popular international brokers. FBS holds a 3.7/5 rating, appealing to beginners with high leverage and simple account structures. FXTM scores 4.3/5, favored for its tighter spreads, strong regulation (FCA, CySEC), and comprehensive trading tools. Both accept China clients via international entities, bypassing CSRC restrictions. For China traders, key considerations include deposit methods like USDT and international bank transfers, as well as trading costs in CNY-equivalent terms. This comparison helps offshore traders decide which broker aligns with their experience level, risk appetite, and local payment preferences.
| Instrument | FBS | FXTM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | FXTM |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | FXTM |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | FXTM |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | FXTM |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $5 | $200 | FXTM |
For China traders, trading costs are critical. FXTM offers spreads from 0.1 pips on ECN accounts, while FBS starts at 0.3 pips on its Zero Spread account. FXTM's commission-based model suits high-volume traders, whereas FBS's fixed spreads on Standard accounts benefit smaller traders. When trading in CNY-equivalent lots, FXTM's lower spreads reduce costs by up to 30% on major pairs like EUR/USD. FBS occasionally offers zero-spread promotions but with wider spreads during volatile markets.
| Account Type | FBS | FXTM |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✓ |
| Min deposit | $5 | $200 |
| Entity / Asset | FBS | FXTM |
|---|---|---|
| China (offshore) | Up to 1:3000 | Up to 1:3000 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:3000 | 1:3000 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | FBS | FXTM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | FBS |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | FBS |
| Crypto CFDs | 30+ | ✗ | FBS |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | ✗ | FXTM |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | FBS | FXTM |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✓ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✓ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✗ |
| TradingView | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Both brokers provide MetaTrader 4 and 5, essential for China traders familiar with these platforms. FXTM also offers MT5 WebTerminal and a proprietary mobile app with Chinese language support. FBS includes a simple WebTrader and mobile app, but lacks advanced charting tools. For China traders using USDT deposits, FXTM's platform integration with crypto wallets is smoother. FBS's platform is more beginner-friendly but less customizable.
| Factor | FBS | FXTM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | FXTM |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | FBS |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
FXTM offers ECN execution with no requotes and average execution speed under 30ms. FBS uses market execution with occasional slippage during news events. For China traders trading volatile pairs like USD/CNY, FXTM's faster execution reduces slippage risk. FBS is acceptable for standard trading but may frustrate scalpers.
| Safety Factor | FBS | FXTM |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | IFSC | FCA |
| Top-tier regulated | ✗ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
FBS is regulated by the IFSC (Belize) and CySEC, while FXTM holds licenses from the FCA (UK), CySEC, and FSCA (South Africa). For China traders, CSRC does not regulate offshore brokers, so choosing a broker with strong third-party regulation (like FXTM's FCA license) adds safety. FBS's IFSC regulation offers less investor protection. FXTM's multi-jurisdictional oversight provides better fund segregation and dispute resolution for China clients.
| Payment Method | FBS | FXTM |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neteller | ✓ | ✓ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✓ | ✓ |
| Withdrawal time | Electronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days. | 24 hours (often in 30 minutes),Credit / Debit Cards (Visa, Mastercard): 1 to 3 business days. |
China traders can fund both brokers using USDT (Tether) and international bank transfers. USDT deposits are processed instantly with no fees, ideal for avoiding CNY conversion costs. Bank transfers take 1-3 business days and may incur intermediary charges. FXTM also supports credit cards and e-wallets (Skrill, Neteller), while FBS offers more crypto options (BTC, ETH). Withdrawals are similar: USDT withdrawals are fastest (24 hours), while bank transfers take 2-5 days. FXTM has a higher minimum withdrawal ($50) compared to FBS ($5). Both brokers allow withdrawals in CNY via USDT conversion.
| Islamic Account Feature | FBS | FXTM |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
Both FBS and FXTM offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Muslim traders in China. FXTM requires a 30-day inactivity period before granting swap-free status, while FBS provides instant swap-free activation. FXTM's Islamic accounts have tighter spreads but may charge a small admin fee after 30 days of inactivity. FBS's Islamic accounts have no extra fees but wider spreads. For China's Muslim traders, FBS is more accessible, while FXTM offers better cost efficiency for active traders.
| Support Feature | FBS | FXTM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | FBS |
Both brokers offer 24/5 customer support in Chinese (Mandarin). FXTM provides live chat, email, and phone support with faster response times (under 2 minutes). FBS offers similar channels but with occasional delays during peak hours. FXTM's support team is more knowledgeable about China-specific issues like USDT deposits and local bank transfers.
| Mobile Feature | FBS | FXTM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | FBS |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | FBS |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Resource | FBS | FXTM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | Monthly | Tie |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | FBS |
Choose FBS if you...
Choose FXTM if you...
For China traders, FXTM is the stronger choice due to its 4.3/5 rating, tighter spreads, and robust regulation. However, FBS suits beginners or those needing instant Islamic accounts and higher leverage. Both support USDT and international bank transfers, but FXTM's lower costs and better execution make it preferable for active traders. Always check CSRC updates and choose a broker that aligns with your trading style and risk management needs.