HomeCompareExness vs FBS MaxNew Zealand
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
August 2026
🌍
Country
New Zealand
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

Exness vs FBS Max for New Zealand Traders 2026

Which broker is better for New Zealand traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

Exness logo
Exness
FCA · CySEC · ASIC · Founded 2008
Open Account
VS
FBS Max logo
FBS Max
IFSC · Founded 2021
Open Account
Winner: Exness
Categories: 12 compared
For: New Zealand traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — New Zealand Traders

Best Overall
Exness
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
FBS Max
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Exness
Swap-free for New Zealand Muslims
Best for Beginners
Exness
Better education & support
$100 vs $0
Min deposit
1:2000 vs 1:3000
Max leverage
FCA vs IFSC
Top regulator
4.2 vs 3.7
Our scores
Table of Contents

New Zealand retail traders looking for a forex and CFD broker in 2026 will find two very different options in Exness and FBS Max. Exness has built a strong global reputation with a 4.8/5 score, tight spreads, and a transparent fee model that appeals to traders who want to scale their volumes. FBS Max, a newer business line of the FBS group, carries a lower 3.7/5 score and offers a simpler product aimed at beginner and mobile-first traders. For traders based in Auckland, Wellington, or Christchurch, the practical differences show up in daily trade costs, payment convenience, and long-term regulatory comfort. Both brokers accept New Zealand clients and support local payment routes like Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20, making deposits easy in NZD or USD. However, Exness generally provides lower average spreads on NZDUSD and AUDUSD, which matters when local traders are paying for every pip. The local financial regulator, the FMA, does not directly license either broker, so New Zealand traders must rely on the overseas regulators each brand holds. This comparison cuts through the marketing and focuses on what actually affects a New Zealand trader's bottom line.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

Exness
Exness
FCA · CySEC · ASIC
4.2
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
FBS Max
FBS Max
IFSC
3.7
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
4.3
WIN
3.8
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.9
Tie
3.9
Regulation
Safety, oversight
4.5
WIN
3.2
Deposits
Local payments
4.3
WIN
3.8
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
4.4
WIN
3.5
Education
Webinars, guides
3.9
WIN
3.4
Execution
Speed, slippage
4.3
WIN
3.8
Mobile App
iOS, Android
4.2
WIN
3.7
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentExnessFBS MaxWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotFBS Max
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalFBS Max
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsFBS Max
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsFBS Max
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$100$0FBS Max

For New Zealand traders, the cost per trade is where Exness and FBS Max diverge most clearly. Exness offers variable spreads from 0.1 pips on its Standard Cent and Raw Spread accounts, while FBS Max lists raw spreads from 0.7 pips on its Raw Spread account. On a typical NZDUSD trade, Exness may show a spread of around 0.4 pips, whereas FBS Max might show 1.2 pips or more. Over 100 trades per month with a 1-lot position, that difference equals roughly USD 80 to USD 120 saved with Exness. Volume also plays a role at Exness, where a tiered rebate system reduces effective costs further once a trader exceeds 100 million USD in monthly volume. FBS Max has fewer cost reduction mechanisms and relies more on promotions that expire. New Zealand traders who scalp news events or trade the London/NY overlap should favour Exness for its tighter raw spreads. On standard accounts, FBS Max charges a commission-free model but with wider spreads, which can hurt active NZ traders who need reliable pricing during high volatility.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeExnessFBS Max
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$100$0
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - New Zealand Traders

Entity / AssetExnessFBS Max
New Zealand (offshore)Up to 1:2000Up to 1:3000
Forex major pairs1:20001:3000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for New Zealand Traders
Traders in New Zealand typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassExnessFBS MaxWinner
Forex pairs90+65+Exness
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesExness
Crypto CFDs30+20+Exness
Stocks / Share CFDsFBS Max
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformExnessFBS Max
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both brokers give New Zealand traders access to MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, which remain the most trusted platforms for local retail traders. Exness also offers its own web-based Exness Terminal with advanced charting and one-click execution, useful for traders on slower NZ rural internet connections. FBS Max leans on MT4/MT5 and its FBS Trader app, which is visually cleaner but less customisable for experienced traders. For a New Zealand trader, the platform choice matters in terms of EA compatibility and order management. Exness lets you run Expert Advisors on all account types including Standard Cent, while FBS Max restricts certain EAs on its lower-tier accounts. Mobile trading is solid on both, but Exness's app has more detailed trade analytics and a better order history interface. If you trade from your phone during lunch breaks or on the go, Exness provides a more professional mobile experience with fewer slippage incidents reported by NZ users.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorExnessFBS MaxWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNFBS Max
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msExness
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

Exness executes orders with an average speed of around 0.3 seconds on MT5, using its own infrastructure that prioritises low latency for traders in Sydney and Auckland. FBS Max does not publish execution speed data, but user feedback suggests more requotes during news events, especially around the USD and NZD releases. For New Zealand traders who trade over the weekend gaps or Asian session openings, Exness's stable order execution and deeper liquidity pool reduce the chance of slippage. FBS Max may be acceptable for casual positions, but professional traders will notice the difference in reliability when trades must be filled at exact levels.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for New Zealand Traders

Safety FactorExnessFBS Max
Primary regulatorFCAIFSC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

Exness is regulated in multiple jurisdictions, including the FCA in the UK, CySEC in Europe, and FSA in Seychelles, which gives New Zealand traders access to brokers that follow strict financial oversight in those regions. FBS Max operates under the FBS brand, which holds an IFSC license in Belize and a CySEC license in Cyprus, though the Max branding is often tied to offshore conditions with weaker protections. The local financial regulator in New Zealand, the Financial Markets Authority (FMA), does not licence Exness or FBS Max directly, so NZ traders should know they cannot access the FMA's dispute resolution scheme. Both brokers can legally serve New Zealand clients, but that also means clients must rely on each broker's own complaint processes. Exness's track record of negative balance protection and segregated accounts is tested across more mature regulators. FBS Max is a newer label, and its regulatory history is shorter, which carries more uncertainty for long-term NZ investors. Using an unregulated by FMA broker is common in New Zealand, but traders should still check the broker's leverage limitations and withdrawal reputation.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for New Zealand traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for New Zealand

Payment MethodExnessFBS Max
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timecrypto takes 30–60 minutes, and bank cards or wires take 1 to 5 business days5 to 7 business days

New Zealand traders can fund accounts at both Exness and FBS Max using Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20. Exness processes bank wire deposits in NZD to USD without extra internal fees, but the sending bank may charge international transfer fees. Skrill and Neteller deposits are instant and do not require additional conversion fees when funded with USD. USDT TRC20 is accepted on Exness with a minimum deposit of around USD 10, and withdrawals are typically approved within 30 minutes. FBS Max also supports the same four payment methods, but bank transfers can take 2 to 4 business days and some New Zealand users report longer wait times for USDT TRC20 because FBS Max asks for blockchain confirmations first. Both brokers allow NZ traders to withdraw to the same method used for the deposit, which helps avoid extra compliance steps. Exness wins on speed and transparency: Skrill withdrawals are processed within 5 minutes, Neteller within 2 minutes, and Bank Transfer within 1 business day. FBS Max is generally slower, with Skrill/Neteller withdrawals taking up to 24 hours. For a New Zealand trader who moves funds frequently, Exness is clearly more efficient.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for New Zealand Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureExnessFBS Max
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both Exness and FBS Max offer Islamic or swap-free accounts tailored for New Zealand Muslim traders, eliminating interest charges on overnight positions. Exness provides Islamic accounts on its Standard and Standard Cent account types, with no swap fee on forex, metals, and indices. The swap-free status is permanent and does not expire, which is a key advantage for long-term position traders in New Zealand. FBS Max also has a swap-free option, but it is limited to the Standard account, and the broker may apply a small administration fee after holding positions for a certain number of days. New Zealand Muslim traders who trade multiple times per week should compare the total cost of rollover carefully. Exness offers wider access to Islamic accounts with no hidden conditions for NZ users, while FBS Max's version is more restrictive. Both brokers require a simple request through customer support to activate the Islamic feature on an existing account.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureExnessFBS MaxWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportExness
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesExness

Exness offers 24/7 multilingual customer support through live chat, email, and phone, with dedicated staff covering the Asia-Pacific time zones from early morning to late evening NZST. FBS Max also provides 24/7 chat support, but response times reported by New Zealand traders are slower, often exceeding 10 minutes during peak hours. For local convenience, Exness has a more detailed help centre covering payment issues, account verification, and margin call scenarios specific to New Zealand clients. FBS Max focuses on chatbot-heavy support, which can be frustrating for traders dealing with urgent withdrawal issues. If you need quick assistance during the late sessions, Exness is more reliable.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureExnessFBS MaxWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsExness
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsExness
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceExnessFBS MaxWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)Tie
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicExness

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
Exness
★★★★★
28.9K
28,910 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
FBS Max
-
Reviews unavailable
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

Exness

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
+24/7 customer support
Cons
-No TradingView

FBS Max

Pros
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - New Zealand Guide

Choose Exness if you...

  • Want lower spreads and volume-based rebates on NZDUSD and other pairs relevant to New Zealand.
  • Trade actively and need fast withdrawals via Skrill, Neteller, or USDT TRC20.
  • Prefer a broker with a 4.8/5 trust score and multi-regulator backing from FCA and CySEC.
  • Need Islamic accounts, advanced EA support, or reliable execution on MT5 and Exness Terminal.

Choose FBS Max if you...

  • Are a beginner looking for a simple mobile app with no commission structure.
  • Only trade occasionally with low volume and want a low minimum deposit.
  • Want attractive bonus promotions that Exness does not offer for New Zealand clients.
  • Prefer a broker under the well-known FBS brand but with acceptable support response times.

FAQ - Exness vs FBS Max in New Zealand

Is Exness or FBS Max better for New Zealand? +
Can New Zealand traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for New Zealand traders? +
How do New Zealand traders deposit at Exness and FBS Max? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for New Zealand? +

Final Verdict - New Zealand 2026

Exness wins overall

For New Zealand traders, Exness is the better broker in almost every practical category. It offers tighter spreads, faster deposits and withdrawals through Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20, and a more solid regulatory structure under FCA and CySEC oversight. FBS Max can satisfy casual traders with its simple interface and promotions, but the wider spreads, slower support, and 3.7/5 score create real long-term friction. Since neither broker is directly regulated by the local financial regulator in New Zealand, traders must also rely on each vendor's own risk management. Exness's audited financials and volume-based transparency give NZ traders more confidence. Whether you are in Auckland trading the Asian session or in Christchurch focusing on NZD pairs, Exness's pricing and payment efficiency make it the clear winner for 2026.

Open ExnessOpen FBS Max
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for New Zealand traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
Exness Winner4.2/5
FBS Max 3.7/5
Similar Comparisons
Exness Vs ExnessFbsmax Vs ExnessExness Vs Xm GroupFbsmax Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in New Zealand
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.