Which broker is better for Brazil traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
Brazil’s growing retail trading community increasingly turns to international brokers like EasyMarkets and FBS Max for forex and CFD trading. Both platforms accept Brazilian Real (BRL) deposits via PIX, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card, making them accessible to local traders. However, they differ in regulation, costs, and platform features. EasyMarkets, with a score of 3.4/5, is known for its user-friendly interface and fixed spreads, appealing to beginners. FBS Max, scoring 3.7/5, offers tighter variable spreads and a broader range of account types, attracting more experienced traders. This comparison focuses on what matters most to Brazil traders: local payment methods, CVM regulatory context, trading costs in BRL, and customer support in Portuguese. Whether you prioritize low costs or ease of use, understanding these differences helps you choose the right broker for your trading style in 2025.
| Instrument | EasyMarkets | FBS Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | FBS Max |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | FBS Max |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | FBS Max |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | FBS Max |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $25 | $0 | FBS Max |
For Brazil traders, trading costs are a key factor, especially when converting profits to BRL. EasyMarkets uses fixed spreads, which average around 1.2 pips on EUR/USD, providing cost certainty but higher per-trade expenses. FBS Max offers variable spreads from 0.0 pips on its ECN account, and typical spreads on EUR/USD are 0.5 pips, making it more cost-effective for high-volume traders. However, FBS Max charges a commission on ECN accounts ($3 per lot), while EasyMarkets has no commission but wider spreads. For Brazil traders trading 5-10 lots per month, FBS Max can reduce total costs by up to 30% compared to EasyMarkets, depending on market conditions. Both brokers have no hidden fees for BRL deposits via PIX.
| Account Type | EasyMarkets | FBS Max |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✗ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $25 | $0 |
| Entity / Asset | EasyMarkets | FBS Max |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil (offshore) | Up to 1:2000 | Up to 1:3000 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:2000 | 1:3000 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | EasyMarkets | FBS Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | EasyMarkets |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | EasyMarkets |
| Crypto CFDs | 30+ | 20+ | EasyMarkets |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | ✗ | FBS Max |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | EasyMarkets | FBS Max |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✗ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✗ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✓ |
| TradingView | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Brazil traders need platforms that are fast, reliable, and available in Portuguese. EasyMarkets offers its proprietary web-based platform and also supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MT5. Its proprietary platform is beginner-friendly with features like deal cancellation and guaranteed stop-loss. FBS Max exclusively uses MetaTrader 4 and MT5, which are industry standards with advanced charting, automated trading, and copy trading. For Brazil traders who prefer algorithmic strategies or social trading, FBS Max’s MT4/MT5 integration is superior. EasyMarkets’ proprietary platform is better for those who want simplicity and risk management tools like negative balance protection.
| Factor | EasyMarkets | FBS Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | FBS Max |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | EasyMarkets |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
Execution quality matters for Brazil traders, especially during volatile BRL pairs. EasyMarkets uses a market maker model with no requotes, offering fixed execution speed of around 50ms. FBS Max uses an STP/ECN model with variable execution speed of 30ms on average, and no dealing desk intervention. For scalpers and day traders in Brazil, FBS Max’s faster execution and deeper liquidity are advantageous. EasyMarkets’ execution is more predictable but can be slower during news events.
| Safety Factor | EasyMarkets | FBS Max |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | CySEC | IFSC |
| Top-tier regulated | ✓ | ✗ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✗ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Brazil traders should note that neither EasyMarkets nor FBS Max holds a license from the CVM (Comissão de Valores Mobiliários). EasyMarkets is regulated by CySEC (Cyprus) and ASIC (Australia), offering negative balance protection and investor compensation up to €20,000 under EU rules. FBS Max is regulated by the IFSC (Belize), which provides less robust investor protection. For Brazil traders, this means that while both are legal to use, FBS Max carries higher regulatory risk. EasyMarkets’ stronger regulatory oversight may appeal to risk-averse traders in Brazil, especially those concerned about fund security. Neither broker offers local CVM coverage, so traders should consider using smaller deposits initially.
| Payment Method | EasyMarkets | FBS Max |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neteller | ✓ | ✓ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✗ | ✓ |
| Withdrawal time | Cards 1-2 business days; e-wallets instant-1 business day; bank wire 3-10 business days; overall back-office processing within 1 business day (24h) | 5 to 7 business days |
Both EasyMarkets and FBS Max support PIX, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card deposits for Brazil traders, making it easy to fund accounts in BRL. EasyMarkets processes PIX deposits instantly with no fees, and withdrawals via PIX are typically processed within 24 hours. Bank Transfers take 1-3 business days. FBS Max also offers instant PIX deposits and supports local methods like Boleto Bancário for deposits. Withdrawals at FBS Max via PIX are processed within 2-4 hours, faster than EasyMarkets. Credit Card deposits are accepted at both, but FBS Max has higher deposit limits (up to 50,000 BRL per transaction) compared to EasyMarkets (up to 20,000 BRL). Both brokers do not charge deposit fees, but FBS Max may levy a small withdrawal fee for Bank Transfers (around 1% for BRL).
| Islamic Account Feature | EasyMarkets | FBS Max |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✓ | ✗ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
For Brazil Muslim traders seeking Sharia-compliant accounts, both brokers offer swap-free (Islamic) accounts. EasyMarkets provides Islamic accounts upon request, with no swap or interest charges on overnight positions, and no additional fees. FBS Max also offers Islamic accounts automatically for eligible clients, but requires a minimum deposit of $50 USD (approximately 250 BRL). FBS Max’s Islamic account supports all account types, including ECN, while EasyMarkets limits Islamic accounts to its standard account. Both brokers require traders to confirm they are Muslim and not using the account for speculative purposes. For Brazil traders, EasyMarkets’ policy is more flexible with no minimum deposit for Islamic accounts, while FBS Max offers tighter spreads on its Islamic ECN account.
| Support Feature | EasyMarkets | FBS Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | EasyMarkets |
Customer support in Portuguese is crucial for Brazil traders. EasyMarkets offers 24/5 live chat and email support in Portuguese, with phone support available during business hours. FBS Max provides 24/7 live chat and email support in Portuguese, plus a dedicated Brazil phone line. FBS Max’s support is more responsive, with average response times under 2 minutes, compared to EasyMarkets’ 5-10 minutes. Both have FAQ sections in Portuguese, but FBS Max also offers a local WhatsApp channel for Brazil clients, adding convenience.
| Mobile Feature | EasyMarkets | FBS Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | EasyMarkets |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | EasyMarkets |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Resource | EasyMarkets | FBS Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | ✗ | EasyMarkets |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | EasyMarkets |
Choose EasyMarkets if you...
Choose FBS Max if you...
For Brazil traders in 2025, the choice between EasyMarkets and FBS Max depends on your trading style and priorities. FBS Max, with a higher overall score of 3.7/5, offers lower spreads, faster execution, and better support for high-volume trading, making it ideal for active traders. It also supports PIX withdrawals in 2-4 hours, a clear advantage for Brazil users. However, its weaker regulation (IFSC) may concern risk-averse traders. EasyMarkets, scoring 3.4/5, is better for beginners or those who prefer fixed costs and stronger regulatory oversight (CySEC). Both accept PIX, Bank Transfer, and Credit Card deposits, but FBS Max has higher limits and more local methods. While neither is CVM-regulated, both are legal in Brazil. Ultimately, FBS Max is the better choice for cost-conscious and active Brazil traders, while EasyMarkets suits those prioritizing simplicity and safety.